On Thursday, 16 Mar 2017 at 20:08, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> However, isn't the current behaviour the right one? I meant, in the
> given example, it was scheduled once "yesterday", so it is really the
> second time it is scheduled today, hence the "2x".
>
> Another way to look at it is by some slop
On Friday, 17 Mar 2017 at 07:42, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Detlef Steuer writes:
>
>> Sure, if you read it as 2x scheduled it is correct.
>>
>> I read it as 1x re-scheduled or 1x overdue.
>> But: Just cosmetics. For me the second way looks more natural.
>
> Fair enough. This is now fixed
Hello,
Detlef Steuer writes:
> Sure, if you read it as 2x scheduled it is correct.
>
> I read it as 1x re-scheduled or 1x overdue.
> But: Just cosmetics. For me the second way looks more natural.
Fair enough. This is now fixed. Thank you.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
i think in terms of days since the date that would be its most recent
appearance.
thus, if yesterday would be its most recent appearance, then it would be 1.
this is consistent with code i have that marks timestamps with the
number of days since the timestamp, with 0 being today.
but yeah, borde
Am Thu, 16 Mar 2017 21:08:43 +0100
schrieb Nicolas Goaziou :
> Hello,
>
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
> > On Thursday, 16 Mar 2017 at 13:45, Detlef Steuer wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> I have a +2 for "something" scheduled for yesterday.
> >> Org git from the morning.
> >
> > Thanks for confirmi
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> On Thursday, 16 Mar 2017 at 13:45, Detlef Steuer wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I have a +2 for "something" scheduled for yesterday.
>>> Org git from the morning.
>>
>> Thanks for confirming. Mine was with yesterday's version of org.
>>
Hello,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Thursday, 16 Mar 2017 at 13:45, Detlef Steuer wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I have a +2 for "something" scheduled for yesterday.
>> Org git from the morning.
>
> Thanks for confirming. Mine was with yesterday's version of org.
>
> Nicolas, I think you may have been thin
On Thursday, 16 Mar 2017 at 13:45, Detlef Steuer wrote:
[...]
> I have a +2 for "something" scheduled for yesterday.
> Org git from the morning.
Thanks for confirming. Mine was with yesterday's version of org.
Nicolas, I think you may have been thinking of a different issue
entirely.
--
: Er
Am Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:05:42 +0100
schrieb Nicolas Goaziou :
> Hello,
>
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
> > Something has been bothering me (in an æsthetic way) for some
> > time. When an event scheduled for the day before is displayed in
> > the default agenda view, it displays the days overdue as "
Hello,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Something has been bothering me (in an æsthetic way) for some
> time. When an event scheduled for the day before is displayed in the
> default agenda view, it displays the days overdue as "2" which seems
> wrong to me. I wonder if somebody can give me the justific
Something has been bothering me (in an æsthetic way) for some
time. When an event scheduled for the day before is displayed in the
default agenda view, it displays the days overdue as "2" which seems
wrong to me. I wonder if somebody can give me the justification for
this?
The code in question,
11 matches
Mail list logo
