I'm writing in RST a lot of documentation, and I noticed that RST-tables
are very similar to org-mode tables.
This makes me think that I could use happily turn-on-orgtbl and use it,
but the tables are not exactly the same.
++---+---+---+
| THi is | table | | |
++--
Andrea Crotti writes:
> I'm writing in RST a lot of documentation, and I noticed that
> RST-tables are very similar to org-mode tables.
>
> This makes me think that I could use happily turn-on-orgtbl and use
> it, but the tables are not exactly the same.
>
> ++---+---+---+
> | THi is
On 09/21/2011 10:23 AM, Jambunathan K wrote:
Andrea Crotti writes:
I'm writing in RST a lot of documentation, and I noticed that
RST-tables are very similar to org-mode tables.
This makes me think that I could use happily turn-on-orgtbl and use
it, but the tables are not exactly the same.
+-
Andrea Crotti writes:
> Didn't know about that, thanks!
> It's not, however, as convenient as org-mode tables are unfortunately...
Which is why you can switch between table.el and org tables with C-c C-c
(to recognize an existing table) and then C-c ~ to convert it between
the two formats if poss
Achim Gratz writes:
>
> Which is why you can switch between table.el and org tables with C-c C-c
> (to recognize an existing table) and then C-c ~ to convert it between
> the two formats if possible. You do lose some formatting going back and
> forth, though.
Very nice thanks a lot!
True some f
