Torsten Wagner writes:
>> I think the main point is that the current set up means that org-mode
>> and org-babel share a common history of commits. My current idea of git
>> submodules is that I would include something as a submodule when it is a
>> module that gets used by multiple different pro
Hi Dan
> Important: The only version of org-babel that's intended for users is
> the version in current org-mode. I.e. the current master branch of
> Carsten's org-mode repository. The other repository (the babel repo) is
> for development only. Any stable improvements in there are rapidly
> merged
> Hi Torsten,
Hi Tom,
> It's not clear to me what outcome you desire. Tangling should result
> in a source file that can serve as input to a compiler or
> interpreter. The combination of :noweb and :session lets you write
> literate programs that are sent directly to an interpreter, whic
On Nov 8, 2009, at 9:38 PM, Torsten Wagner wrote:
Hi Tom,
If I try to use the noweb way, I always got error messages which
tells me that
org-babel can not read the result correctly
#+srcname: r-load-libraries
#+begin_src R
library(RMySQL)
library(reshape)
library(xtable)
#+end_src
Hi Torsten,
Torsten Wagner writes:
<...>
> Could you please tell me which of the branches in the babel-git includes the
> best working version for noweb usage.
Important: The only version of org-babel that's intended for users is
the version in current org-mode. I.e. the current master branch
Hi Tom,
If I try to use the noweb way, I always got error messages which tells me that
org-babel can not read the result correctly
>
> #+srcname: r-load-libraries
> #+begin_src R
>library(RMySQL)
>library(reshape)
>library(xtable)
> #+end_src
As I see you do not use any special he
Hi Dan,
thanks for trying helping me out
actually your example works for me after switching back to git-babel master
branch.
However, my file does still not work and I can not see a difference between
your
and mine file.
I will try to minimize it now to the point where it either works or stil
Hi Torsten,
Torsten Wagner writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I tried to use the noweb-syntax to tangle all the pieces of source code
> blocks
> together as proposed by Tom.
>
> However, for some reasons it does not work.
> I notice there are two different syntax for noweb. One propsed on worg and
>
On Nov 8, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Torsten Wagner wrote:
Hi everyone,
I tried to use the noweb-syntax to tangle all the pieces of source
code blocks
together as proposed by Tom.
However, for some reasons it does not work.
I notice there are two different syntax for noweb. One propsed on
worg and
Hi everyone,
I tried to use the noweb-syntax to tangle all the pieces of source code blocks
together as proposed by Tom.
However, for some reasons it does not work.
I notice there are two different syntax for noweb. One propsed on worg and the
other in examples here in the mailing list. Which
10 matches
Mail list logo
