Dear org-mode developers,
adding a new list item via M-RET (org-insert-heading) may change
text in a previous list item, if this ends in a number on a
single line followed by a dot:
---
- Several astonishing things happened in
2007.
- And then there was another item.
I can reproduce this in org-mode 7.4 with emacs 24.
This occurs most often for me when listing a bibliography in a plain
list when I have auto-fill-mode on.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Dear org-mode developers,
>
> adding a new list item via M-RET (org-insert-heading)
Hello,
> Gregor Zattler writes:
> adding a new list item via M-RET (org-insert-heading) may change
> text in a previous list item, if this ends in a number on a single
> line followed by a dot:
> ---
> - Several astonishing things happened in
> 2007.
> - And
Hi,
For once, I have to disagree: Numbers at the beginning of the line
inadvertently starting a list item is a bug.
It means you can mess up your exported document (it doesn't just
happen at M-RET) by just writing a perfectly normal text, and there is
no easy-to-remember escape. (I really do
Hello,
> Christian Moe writes:
> Numbers at the beginning of the line inadvertently starting a list
> item is a bug.
You call it a bug, but it is actually the Org definition of a numbered
item. This is in the manual. Though, I think I understand what you
mean: this definition can lead to sur
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Christian Moe writes:
>
>> Numbers at the beginning of the line inadvertently starting a list
>> item is a bug.
>
> You call it a bug, but it is actually the Org definition of a numbered
> item. This is in the manual. Though,
Hello,
> Jeff Horn writes:
> What about a compromise? I envision an editable variable called
> "org-plain-list-regexp-delimiter" (in the same vein as
> "org-export-latex-emphasis-alist") that is a list of delimiters
> recognized for plain lists. I rarely use periods (always use
> parentheses)
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> It is certainly doable, but it wouldn't help for the problem at hand.
> There is already a way to not use dots (this is the solution you
> envision), but only parenthesis, as numbered items separators.
Is there a variable? It would appear
On 2/3/11 3:09 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Christian Moe writes:
Numbers at the beginning of the line inadvertently starting a list
item is a bug.
You call it a bug, but it is actually the Org definition of a numbered
item. This is in the manual. Though, I think I understand what you
