Hi Michael,
Michael Sperber writes:
>> Michael, did you had time to progress on this?
>
> Not yet. But it is on my list.
Good - thanks for the update!
--
Bastien
Bastien writes:
> Hi,
>
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> I like the patch, but since it is not critical it remains
>> on ice until :eval is supported by XEmacs.
>>
>> Michael, it would be nice if you could put :eval into
>> XEmacs so that we can use this improved code for the
>> mode line. Pleas
Hi,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I like the patch, but since it is not critical it remains
> on ice until :eval is supported by XEmacs.
>
> Michael, it would be nice if you could put :eval into
> XEmacs so that we can use this improved code for the
> mode line. Please make sure to let us know when
Hi Julien,
I like the patch, but since it is not critical it remains
on ice until :eval is supported by XEmacs.
Michael, it would be nice if you could put :eval into
XEmacs so that we can use this improved code for the
mode line. Please make sure to let us know when this is done.
- Carsten
On
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi XEmacs users
>
> I am about to apply this patch, but I am still wondering
> if :eval in the mode line is working on XEmacs?
Sorry, missed that one: XEmacs does not currently have :eval. This
might be a good reason to add it to XEmacs, but it would probably take
me
Hi XEmacs users
I am about to apply this patch, but I am still wondering
if :eval in the mode line is working on XEmacs?
- Carsten
On Dec 13, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
XEmacs users, please read this.
On Dec 12, 2010, at 7:55 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12 2010, Car
XEmacs users, please read this.
On Dec 12, 2010, at 7:55 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12 2010, Carsten Dominik wrote:
what is the purpose of this patch, why is it needed?
I generally will not accept patches that lack this information.
Sorry, it seems quite obvious to me.
Hi Julien
On Sun, Dec 12 2010, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> what is the purpose of this patch, why is it needed?
> I generally will not accept patches that lack this information.
Sorry, it seems quite obvious to me.
The purpose is to stop trying to guess where to call the function to
`org-agenda-set-mode-name
Hi Julien,
what is the purpose of this patch, why is it needed?
I generally will not accept patches that lack this information.
- Carsten
On Dec 6, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
* org-agenda.el (org-agenda-filter-apply)
(org-agenda-filter-by-tag-show-all) (org-agenda-change-time-span
* org-agenda.el (org-agenda-filter-apply)
(org-agenda-filter-by-tag-show-all) (org-agenda-change-time-span)
(org-remove-subtree-entries-from-agenda) (org-agenda-entry-text-mode,
org-agenda-clockreport-mode) (org-agenda-toggle-diary,
org-agenda-archives-mode) (org-agenda-toggle-deadlines,
org-agenda
10 matches
Mail list logo
