Re: [Orgmode] [Patch] Add another bullet type (→)

2009-03-16 Thread Martin Pohlack
Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Mar 16, 2009, at 2:04 AM, Daniel Clemente wrote: [...] >> However, I have done it always like this: >> >> - Topic >> - Fact 1 >> - Fact 2 >> - → Conclusion > > > This is, actually, a much better idea, so let's not go there > and make the item bullets c

Re: [Orgmode] [Patch] Add another bullet type ( →)

2009-03-16 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 16, 2009, at 2:04 AM, Daniel Clemente wrote: El vie, mar 13 2009, Martin Pohlack va escriure: Hi All, I tend to use a right arrow (→, U2192) from time to time in plain lists to separate normal item from conclusions / next actions etc.: Hey, me too! I use exactly → to hightlight item

Re: [Orgmode] [Patch] Add another bullet type ( →)

2009-03-15 Thread Daniel Clemente
El vie, mar 13 2009, Martin Pohlack va escriure: > Hi All, > > I tend to use a right arrow (→, U2192) from time to time in plain > lists to separate normal item from conclusions / next actions etc.: Hey, me too! I use exactly → to hightlight items, but also to mark implications (I use ∴ for con

Re: [Orgmode] [Patch] Add another bullet type ( →)

2009-03-14 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Martin, thank you for the patch. I will, however, not install it, at least not in the present form. Org-mode is hard-core plain text, and for me this also means that all the control parts that have special meaning should be plain ASCII characters. The only exception is that tags are allowed

[Orgmode] [Patch] Add another bullet type (→)

2009-03-13 Thread Martin Pohlack
Hi All, I tend to use a right arrow (→, U2192) from time to time in plain lists to separate normal item from conclusions / next actions etc.: - Topic - Fact 1 - Fact 2 → Conclusion I would appreciate it if org-mode could support this type of bullet point. The attached patch implem