Carsten Dominik writes:
>>> Isn't org-annotation-helper.el obsolete? I thought org-protocol.el has
>>> supplanted it completely, in which case it might be better to just
>>> delete it from the tree, instead of fixing it (or perhaps move it
>>> to a deprecated area) - that would also help in not co
On Nov 9, 2009, at 10:10 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
Nick Dokos writes:
Adam Spiers wrote:
org-annotation-helper.el uses caddr but does not require the cl
package; this results in
*ERROR*: Symbol's function definition is void: caddr
when bzg/org-annotate-helper is invoked.
Isn't org-a
Nick Dokos writes:
> Adam Spiers wrote:
>
>> org-annotation-helper.el uses caddr but does not require the cl
>> package; this results in
>>
>> *ERROR*: Symbol's function definition is void: caddr
>>
>> when bzg/org-annotate-helper is invoked.
>>
>>
>
> Isn't org-annotation-helper.el obsolet
Adam Spiers wrote:
> org-annotation-helper.el uses caddr but does not require the cl
> package; this results in
>
> *ERROR*: Symbol's function definition is void: caddr
>
> when bzg/org-annotate-helper is invoked.
>
>
Isn't org-annotation-helper.el obsolete? I thought org-protocol.el has
s
org-annotation-helper.el uses caddr but does not require the cl
package; this results in
*ERROR*: Symbol's function definition is void: caddr
when bzg/org-annotate-helper is invoked.
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send r
