Carsten Dominik wrote:
Dear all,
I am having a lot of trouble keeping up with everything here in emacs-
orgmode, in combination with the rest of my life.
Is there anyone who would be willing to step up as a co-maintainer, at
least for some time?
The tasks would include looking at small patches
Hi David,
I think this i an excellent idea, and keeping this file on Worg so
that people can access it on the web and modify it when needed is a
good idea.
If everyone agrees, then I am glad to accept your offer to start a
system like this.
Matt, I guess this covers pretty much exactly
On May 20, 2010, at 10:22 AM, David Maus wrote:
Both systems would form a queue of things to be done: The organizing
task consists of (a) reviewing non-patch-issues and (b) reviewing open
patch-issues in patchwork and (c) make decisions (e.g. apply patch,
comment, etc.).
This is something
Dear all,
I am having a lot of trouble keeping up with everything here in emacs-
orgmode, in combination with the rest of my life.
Is there anyone who would be willing to step up as a co-maintainer, at
least for some time?
The tasks would include looking at small patches people submit,
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Is there anyone who would be willing to step up as a co-maintainer, at
least for some time?
I'd be glad to help, but I'm short of time for the moment and I prefer
to concentrate on maintaining the server and Worg.
You made Org a
On May 19, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Bastien wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Is there anyone who would be willing to step up as a co-maintainer,
at
least for some time?
I'd be glad to help, but I'm short of time for the moment and I prefer
to concentrate on
Aloha Carsten,
From my view on the list it appears you work without a queue, which
seems counterintuitive for a Lisp programmer of Org-mode :) But a
queue for Carsten is not the answer because Org-mode people love the
furious pace of development and would likely chafe at a slow queue.
