Re: [Orgmode] FR: org-hide-context

2010-01-01 Thread Scot Becker
I'm not the OP, but that works for me. Somehow I thought I'd loose my place when I did S-TAB. Thanks, On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > Hi Adam, > > I am not sure I find this useful. > > to localize, I usually do > > S-TAB to hide everything > C-c C-r to reveal

Re: [Orgmode] FR: org-hide-context

2010-01-01 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Adam, I am not sure I find this useful. to localize, I usually do S-TAB to hide everything C-c C-r to reveal the current location Can you maybe describe a bit more what this is supposed to do and under what circumstances you'd like to use this? Thanks. - Carsten On Dec 16, 2009, at

Re: [Orgmode] FR: org-hide-context

2009-12-16 Thread Dan Davison
Scot Becker writes: > I like that, too. > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: > > It would be great to have an opposite to `org-reveal' which folded all > siblings, ancestors, and maybe even all ancestors' siblings of the > current headline.  A suitable key-bindin

Re: [Orgmode] FR: org-hide-context

2009-12-16 Thread Scot Becker
I like that, too. On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: > It would be great to have an opposite to `org-reveal' which folded all > siblings, ancestors, and maybe even all ancestors' siblings of the > current headline. A suitable key-binding might be C-u C-u C-c C-r > or similar.

[Orgmode] FR: org-hide-context

2009-12-16 Thread Adam Spiers
It would be great to have an opposite to `org-reveal' which folded all siblings, ancestors, and maybe even all ancestors' siblings of the current headline. A suitable key-binding might be C-u C-u C-c C-r or similar. Thanks, Adam ___ Emacs-orgmode mail