On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 07:36:17AM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2007, at 19:18, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >Now that I am beginning to get really serious about implementing the
> >review component of GTD, new ideas for org-mode tweaks are continually
> >popping into my head; apologies for s
On Oct 17, 2007, at 19:18, Adam Spiers wrote:
Now that I am beginning to get really serious about implementing the
review component of GTD, new ideas for org-mode tweaks are continually
popping into my head; apologies for spamming the list recently as a
result :-) Several of the tweaks would re
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just one concern : if Org someday implements promoting/demoting of list
> items and sublists, I think we'd like to have these keybindings:
>
> - S-left/right : demote/promote a list item
> - S-M-left/right : demote/promote a whole sublist
Of course, I was
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Excellent. I'd forgotten there were so many list types/styles though,
>> it seems that this might be better on some kind of cycle (like the
>> priority cookies). I don't know what key binding you could use
>> though. Could holding CTRL and using th
On Oct 17, 2007, at 11:08, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Oct 16, 2007, at 18:22, Adam Spiers wrote:
Rick Moynihan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Adam Spiers wrote:
This seems like a good idea. Another related one occurred to me
today
(if it's necessary) which is toggling betwe
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:13:41PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2007, at 16:19, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I
> > think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and
> > <>.
> >
> > Why? Say I have an even
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Oct 16, 2007, at 18:22, Adam Spiers wrote:
Rick Moynihan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Adam Spiers wrote:
This seems like a good idea. Another related one occurred to me today
(if it's necessary) which is toggling between the two list indicators.
e.g.
- foo
- bar
-
On Oct 16, 2007, at 18:22, Adam Spiers wrote:
Rick Moynihan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Adam Spiers wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I
think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and
<>.
Why? Say I have an event in my
Adam Spiers wrote:
This seems like a good idea. Another related one occurred to me today
(if it's necessary) which is toggling between the two list indicators.
e.g.
- foo
- bar
- baz |<-- Point
Calling the toggle-list-indicator function at the point will cause the
list indicator to change
Hi Adam,
On Oct 16, 2007, at 16:19, Adam Spiers wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I
think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and
<>.
Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subsequently
told my presence
Rick Moynihan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Adam Spiers wrote:
> >Hi Carsten,
> >
> >Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I
> >think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and
> ><>.
> >
> >Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subse
Adam Spiers wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I
think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and
<>.
Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subsequently
told my presence at the event is no longer necessary.
Hi Carsten,
Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I
think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and
<>.
Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subsequently
told my presence at the event is no longer necessary. Consequently I
would
13 matches
Mail list logo
