Fine by me.
regards,
Tim.
On 16 December 2013 16:52, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Thanks Tim. Perhaps this could go in the contrib/lisp/ directory?
>
> On 16 December 2013 14:02, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
>> Hi Adam.
>>
>> I still lurk on the org-mode list. I'm not using org as much as a TODO
>> system
Thanks Tim. Perhaps this could go in the contrib/lisp/ directory?
On 16 December 2013 14:02, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
> Hi Adam.
>
> I still lurk on the org-mode list. I'm not using org as much as a TODO
> system any more, mostly for publishing and notes, so I am not sure if
> it works with the la
Hi Adam.
I still lurk on the org-mode list. I'm not using org as much as a TODO
system any more, mostly for publishing and notes, so I am not sure if
it works with the lates version of org.
Attached is the code, released for those that might find it of value.
It has not substantially changed in a
Hey Tim,
I realise this is from over 4 years ago, but I was wondering if you'd
made any progress with org-action-verbs since then? It's a great idea
and IMHO worthy of being made into a package.
Cheers,
Adam
On 1 October 2009 03:29, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
> Small update. Fixes the problem of t
Small update. Fixes the problem of the highlighting not disappearing
when headline is fixed.
- Still has some issues with removing highlighting when TODO becomes
something else.
- Added new default verbs:
TODO, NEXT -> Call, Email, Fix, Find, Fill out, Give, Print, Re-Do, Take
PROJECT -> Configur
Attached is a working implementation of the idea.
So, in GTD each 'next action' is supposed to be an actual doable
thing to further the project it is associated with.
When creating next actions or project headlines there is sometimes
a tendency to use a heading that is a bit vague/undoable. This
ut it should be customizable per keyword and per todo item.
>
> A few options I can think of:
> - Don't Process enforce if the todo item has checkboxes in it
> - Loose enforcement, don't bug the user at all, only use agenda functionality.
> - Strict enforcement, don't let t
ade. :p
-Original Message-
From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+jonathana=criticalmass@gnu.org
[mailto:emacs-orgmode-bounces+jonathana=criticalmass@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Tim O'Callaghan
Sent: August 3, 2009 7:47 AM
To: org-mode
Subject: [Orgmode] Feature Request: "Keeping me honest
Hi, I'm not sure how/if these are implemented or implementable.
* "Keeping Me honest"
When i outline a project, sometimes there are points that are
ambigiously stated. Being neither actions or titles, they can slip
through the cracks. So i've been thinking of a feature that would be
simil
