On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:22, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
Once again, it hit reply instead of reply-all.
Edd
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eddward DeVilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mar 18, 2007 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Feature in org-move-item-down
To: Mike Newman &
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree that making empty lines always close all levels of items would
> be another stable implementation. Hmm.
I think the current implementation is okay, leaving the possibility for
list items to contain empty lines. Great for long list items,
On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:26, Mike Newman wrote:
The manual (section 2.8) says
"Indentation also determines the end of a list item. It ends before
the next line that is indented like the bullet/number, or less."
Yes, you are right, I am treating an empty line as a line with a large
indentation
Once again, it hit reply instead of reply-all.
Edd
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eddward DeVilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mar 18, 2007 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Feature in org-move-item-down
To: Mike Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I sometimes have blank l
The manual (section 2.8) says
"Indentation also determines the end of a list item. It ends before the next
line that is indented like the bullet/number, or less."
I think that a blank line has 0 indentation, therefore (by this logic)
it should end a list item. Clearly a blank line cannot start
On Mar 17, 2007, at 4:15, Mike Newman wrote:
It appears org-move-item-down treats blank lines as part of the
preceding list item (whereas I use them to separate a list from
subsequent text).
So given
- a test
- b test
- c test
test
with point on line b, M-x org-move-item-down gives
- a test
It appears org-move-item-down treats blank lines as part of the
preceding list item (whereas I use them to separate a list from
subsequent text).
So given
- a test
- b test
- c test
test
with point on line b, M-x org-move-item-down gives
- a test
- c test
- b test
test
Thanks
--
Mike
_
