On Dec 11, 2007 3:58 PM, Phil Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On a side note; I use C-p, C-n, C-b and C-f for my basic navigation
> meaning the cursor keys are free for me so in org I bind them to:
>
> ,
> | (define-key org-mode-map [left] 'org-metaleft)
> | (define-key org-mode-map [
Charles Cave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Or you could just do "M-return M-right" - is that really too slow for
>> you?
>
> Thank you! I hadn't thought of that. Entering M-right is easy
> because I am already holding the Meta key with my thumb so it is just
> a matter of continuing to hold the
> Will
> Or you could just do "M-return M-right" - is that really too slow for
> you?
Thank you! I hadn't thought of that. Entering M-right is
easy because I am already holding the Meta key with my thumb
so it is just a matter of continuing to hold the thumb and hitting
the right arrow key.
Charles Cave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason for this functionality is when using org-mode for brainstorming.
> I want to quickly add more than one child heading to the current heading.
> Adding the first child heading is slower because I have to do a M-RET
> backspace backspace asterisk
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:03:15AM +1100, Charles Cave wrote:
> org-mode has the feature of entering M-RET to insert a heding with the same
> level as current.
>
> I would like a command to enter a new headline at a level BELOW the current
> headline. The command key binding could be a modificato
Hi Charles
On Dec 10, 2007 4:03 PM, Charles Cave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like a command to enter a new headline at a level BELOW the current
> headline. The command key binding could be a modificaton to M-RET maybe
> adding
> the ctl or shift key.
>
> The reason for this functionali
org-mode has the feature of entering M-RET to insert a heding with the same
level as current.
I would like a command to enter a new headline at a level BELOW the current
headline. The command key binding could be a modificaton to M-RET maybe adding
the ctl or shift key.
The reason for this funct