Re: [Orgmode] GitHub

2010-06-03 Thread Ian Barton
On 02/06/10 20:46, Daniel Martins wrote: Maybe this is a silly question but Is it possible to use UbuntuOne as an alternative to DropBox? https://one.ubuntu.com Not silly at all. Yes you can. There a couple of differences: Ubuntu One handles symlinks differently to Dropbox. Ubuntu One is not

Re: [Orgmode] GitHub

2010-06-02 Thread Daniel Martins
Maybe this is a silly question but Is it possible to use UbuntuOne as an alternative to DropBox? https://one.ubuntu.com Daniel 2010/5/31 Carsten Dominik > Hi Matt, > > you might want to consider adding support for the Dropbox API to MobileOrg > Android. I am currently testing this setup with

Re: [Orgmode] GitHub

2010-05-31 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Matt, you might want to consider adding support for the Dropbox API to MobileOrg Android. I am currently testing this setup with Richard's beta. It is vastly superior compared to the webdav stuff, at least in terms of user setup required and hickups that can cause problems. In the f

Re: [Orgmode] GitHub

2010-05-24 Thread Bastien
(Sorry for the late and probably outdated answer.) Carsten Dominik writes: > - Bastien - I guess on the web server, we would simply make a > new clone from the new location, right? Right :) -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `R

Re: [Orgmode] GitHub

2010-05-22 Thread tycho garen
As a brief prelude, I'd like to say that while I think github is a great service, for development communities, and provides a number of very enticing features, there are some aspects that make it less than ideal: Projects are owned by individual developer's "personal" accounts and it's sometimes

Re: [Orgmode] GitHub

2010-05-22 Thread Matthew Jones
In the Administration panel for projects on Github there is a section for Service Hooks which looks like it could be used to mirror the changes to another repository. 73, Matthew W. Jones (KI4ZIB) http://matburt.net On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote: > Hi, > > since a numbe

[Orgmode] GitHub

2010-05-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi, since a number of you have voiced a strong preference for Org-mode to be hosted on GitHub, I am not considering such a step. Could someone spell out for me what steps I would have to take to do this? In particular: - How do I get the entire current repo onto GitHub? - Can I set up rep

Re: [Orgmode] Github understands us

2010-02-17 Thread Kyle Sexton
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Scot Becker wrote: > Wow.  That's nice.  Now if only I could fork Github itself > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Sebastian Rose > wrote: >> >> Andrea Crotti writes: >> > Maybe some of you already noticed, but I found out that actually github >> > understa

Re: [Orgmode] Github understands us

2010-02-17 Thread Scot Becker
Wow. That's nice. Now if only I could fork Github itself On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > Andrea Crotti writes: > > Maybe some of you already noticed, but I found out that actually github > > understands org-mode! > > > > If you put a README.org it just works, there

Re: [Orgmode] Github understands us

2010-02-17 Thread Sebastian Rose
Andrea Crotti writes: > Maybe some of you already noticed, but I found out that actually github > understands org-mode! > > If you put a README.org it just works, there surely are some minor > problems (for example footnotes) but see for example here > http://github.com/AndreaCrotti/Razz > for an

[Orgmode] Github understands us

2010-02-17 Thread Andrea Crotti
Maybe some of you already noticed, but I found out that actually github understands org-mode! If you put a README.org it just works, there surely are some minor problems (for example footnotes) but see for example here http://github.com/AndreaCrotti/Razz for an example.