Re: [Orgmode] Highlighting Sparse Tree Leaves

2008-02-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Wanrong, thanks for the code. It looks good, I will put it into my trickler to reconsider a some time in the future. - Carsten On Feb 21, 2008, at 11:53 PM, Wanrong Lin wrote: Hi, Carsten, I hacked a patch that does what I need. Just in case you change your mind in the future, or anyone

Re: [Orgmode] Highlighting Sparse Tree Leaves

2008-02-21 Thread Wanrong Lin
Hi, Carsten, I hacked a patch that does what I need. Just in case you change your mind in the future, or anyone else has the same need as I, here is the patch (against org.el in 5.22a. I did not get time to learn git yet). Thanks. Wanrong 15082c15082,15085

Re: [Orgmode] Highlighting Sparse Tree Leaves

2008-02-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Feb 18, 2008, at 4:19 PM, Wanrong Lin wrote: Using "PROJECT" as a TODO keyword certainly can work, however, my work flow usually is first quickly mark anything that needs action with "TODO" and later I may add more sub-items to it. Following this approach I will need to remember to ch

Re: [Orgmode] Highlighting Sparse Tree Leaves

2008-02-18 Thread Wanrong Lin
Using "PROJECT" as a TODO keyword certainly can work, however, my work flow usually is first quickly mark anything that needs action with "TODO" and later I may add more sub-items to it. Following this approach I will need to remember to change "TODO" to "PROJECT" once a TODO item starts to h

Re: [Orgmode] Highlighting Sparse Tree Leaves

2008-02-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Wanrong, No, I think you need to find a different way around this. For example by using a different keyword for the headings that contain the true TODO items. I use PROJECT or something similar. When you then search for TODO, the true tasks will be highlighted. - Carsten On Feb 15, 2008,

[Orgmode] Highlighting Sparse Tree Leaves

2008-02-14 Thread Wanrong Lin
Hi, Is it possible to highlighting only the sparse tree leaves, or even better, highlighting the whole sparse tree but with leaves in a special face? The motivation for such a feature is this: Suppose I have a task tree like this: * TODO Task A *** TODO Task A.1 * TODO Task A.1.1 * TODO