[Orgmode] Re: [babel] dot in pdf directly

2009-11-12 Thread Julien Barnier
Hi, > A question about updating org... > I also have all my .emacs.d under git, so if I put > the whole org-mode in it (46M) I wast a lot of space. > But if I don't then every time I can't just "git pull" but I need more > operations, which can be annoying, how do you deal with it? In my experien

[Orgmode] Re: [babel] dot in pdf directly

2009-11-12 Thread andrea Crotti
A question about updating org... I also have all my .emacs.d under git, so if I put the whole org-mode in it (46M) I wast a lot of space. But if I don't then every time I can't just "git pull" but I need more operations, which can be annoying, how do you deal with it? For the capitalization I coul

Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] dot in pdf directly

2009-11-10 Thread Eric Schulte
andrea Crotti writes: > Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes: > >> Note that the solution I'm about to propose relies on the use of >> org-babel and #+begin_src dot blocks rather than #+begin_dot blocks. >> >> When in these situations I will often set the block so that neither the >> code or the resu

[Orgmode] Re: [babel] dot in pdf directly

2009-11-10 Thread andrea Crotti
Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes: > Note that the solution I'm about to propose relies on the use of > org-babel and #+begin_src dot blocks rather than #+begin_dot blocks. > > When in these situations I will often set the block so that neither the > code or the resulting image is exported, and so

Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] dot in pdf directly

2009-11-10 Thread Eric Schulte
Sebastian Rose writes: > andrea Crotti writes: >> Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes: >> >>> >>> The two separate mechanisms are confusion, but for now are necessary to >>> allow org-mode users to evaluate some simple block types (like dot) on >>> export without having to load up all of org-babel.

Re: [Orgmode] Re: [babel] dot in pdf directly

2009-11-10 Thread Sebastian Rose
andrea Crotti writes: > Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes: > >> >> The two separate mechanisms are confusion, but for now are necessary to >> allow org-mode users to evaluate some simple block types (like dot) on >> export without having to load up all of org-babel. >> >> I hope the above isn't to

[Orgmode] Re: [babel] dot in pdf directly

2009-11-09 Thread andrea Crotti
Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes: > > The two separate mechanisms are confusion, but for now are necessary to > allow org-mode users to evaluate some simple block types (like dot) on > export without having to load up all of org-babel. > > I hope the above isn't too confusing :) -- Eric > No n