Hi Tom,
On Feb 8, 2009, at 9:25 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
I think what is missing now is documentation. It seems to me that
there should be some minimal documentation in org-choose.el,
and it would be great to get a tutorial on Worg which describes
this in more detail.
What sort of forma
> Hi Tom,
>
> I have now added org-choose.el, it is part of the current git status.
>
> A few comments:
>
[...]
> Yes, this is correct. I appreciate you noticing this additional
> point where changes have to be made.
> However, for now I have opted for a different solution: I made the
> sequence
Hi Tom,
I have now added org-choose.el, it is part of the current git status.
A few comments:
On Feb 7, 2009, at 9:46 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
Hi, Carsten. Here is the new patch to org.el and the new
org-choose.el
A couple of notes:
* As we talked about, "decisions" and "chosenness"
Hi Tom,
On Feb 6, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
Hi Tom,
[...]
WIth you patch, we have right now
CHOOSEas the prefix
choseness as the interpretation
org-decision as the name of the module.
My request would be to maybe use `choose' also as the
interpretation symbol, or, alt
> Hi Tom,
> [...]
> WIth you patch, we have right now
>
> CHOOSEas the prefix
> choseness as the interpretation
> org-decision as the name of the module.
>
> My request would be to maybe use `choose' also as the
> interpretation symbol, or, alternatively, CHOSENESS
> as the prefix.
Yes. I th
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> CHOOSEas the prefix
> choseness as the interpretation
> org-decision as the name of the module.
>
> My request would be to maybe use `choose' also as the
> interpretation symbol, or, alternatively, CHOSENESS
> as the prefix.
>
I believe
Hi Tom,
I am now looking at org-decision and start to integrate it.
There is one point I'd like to discuss.
My preferred way to do the integration is opening a new hacking door
which will not require changes to org.el for other people doing
similar stuff.
So my idea would be to search for
Hi Tom,
On 2009-01-31 13:36:20(-0500), Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
> > Also, I am interested in the testing environment, and what
> > you made here may end up to be enough to establish a testing
> > framework for Org-mode.
>
> > If it turns out to be like this, maybe you can make a tutorial
> > on t
> Hi Tom,
>
> this looks awesome.
>
> Right now I am stabilizing everything to make my final release
> for Emacs 23.1, so it may be a week or two before I get to
> integrate this.
Understood.
> Also, I am interested in the testing environment, and what
> you made here may end up to be enough to e
Hi Tom,
this looks awesome.
Right now I am stabilizing everything to make my final release
for Emacs 23.1, so it may be a week or two before I get to
integrate this.
Also, I am interested in the testing environment, and what
you made here may end up to be enough to establish a testing
framework
> P.S. What is you copyright status with the FSF?
I believe I'm already good to go. A few years back when I contributed
some code to emacs' lread.c, RMS had me sign and send the letter that
legally enabled FSF to include it. IIUC, that step only has to be
done once for any code contributor.
>
Hi Tom,
I went through your draft and I think this is interesting functionality
which would be really nice to have.
I also see that you have thought carefully on how to implement it
and minimize impact on the core code, which I appreciate.
I would be happy to to make/accept the following change
12 matches
Mail list logo
