On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:03:12AM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 07:13:49PM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
> > So it seems to me that the bug is somewhere fairly deep in emacs
> > itself (btw, I sent a bug report off to the emacs maintainers - we'll
> > see what they say). I also tr
Paul R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I currently don't use export, and have very little time to track this
> bug down. Do you use combined org files for export ? IOW, do you have
> a single org file or multiple files ?
>
I don't use export very much either - for now, I 'm playing with it, which
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 07:13:49PM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
> So it seems to me that the bug is somewhere fairly deep in emacs
> itself (btw, I sent a bug report off to the emacs maintainers - we'll
> see what they say). I also tried on an ancient RHEL4.1(?) system with
> the stock emacs 21 versio
Nick Dokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After some testing (it took me a while to get back to it - sorry for the
> delay), it certainly looks like the bug is somewhere other than
> org-export-icalendar, but I'm not sure that debian site-lisp is to blame
> in this case (although I may very well be
Paul R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Dokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> You have some faulty site-lisp code provided by debian emacs packages.
> Because it was the Nth bug I had to track down due to the way debian
> handles site-lisp, I just decided to get rid, for good, of debian
> emacs
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:29:04AM +0200, Paul R wrote:
> Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm not sure this bug is specific to Debian - it has been plaguing me
> > on Fedora... unless there are two separate causes of the same error
> > message.
>
> Do Fedora have a similar distribut
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure this bug is specific to Debian - it has been plaguing me
> on Fedora... unless there are two separate causes of the same error
> message.
Do Fedora have a similar distribution system for side-wide lisp ?
> To be honest I'm not even convinced
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:02:37PM +0200, Paul R wrote:
> Nick Dokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> You have some faulty site-lisp code provided by debian emacs packages.
> Because it was the Nth bug I had to track down due to the way debian
> handles site-lisp, I just decided to get rid, for goo
Nick Dokos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
You have some faulty site-lisp code provided by debian emacs packages.
Because it was the Nth bug I had to track down due to the way debian
handles site-lisp, I just decided to get rid, for good, of debian
emacs packages, and do everything by hand. So I'm sor
