Baoqiu Cui writes:
> Before I change the document for variable
> `org-export-docbook-xslt-proc-command', let's finalize the design of
> this first. :-)
>
> Currently `org-export-docbook-xslt-proc-command' contains two
> format-like specs: "%i" (for the input DocBook XML file) and "%o" (for
> the
dsm...@vtiinstruments.com (Dale P. Smith) writes:
Hi Dale and Carsten,
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> do I still need to do something with #+XSLT? If yes, could you please
>> spell it out for me?
>
> Ok!
>
> So now the command to process docbook to whatever is more flexible.
> Previously, the t
Sorry for the late reply, Dale and Carsten.
Yes, I think this patch should be a applied, as it makes things more
flexible. (Thanks, Dale!)
The only thing missing in the patch is the docstrings of variables
org-export-docbook-xslt-proc-command and
org-export-docbook-xsl-fo-proc-command. I'll wor
Carsten Dominik writes:
> do I still need to do something with #+XSLT? If yes, could you please
> spell it out for me?
Ok!
So now the command to process docbook to whatever is more flexible.
Previously, the the order of input file and output file were fixed,
and the stylesheet was hard-coded i
Dale,
do I still need to do something with #+XSLT? If yes, could you please
spell it out for me?
Thanks.
- Carsten
On May 13, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Dale P. Smith wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Somehow I do net seem to have a patch relating to this thread. Can
you please send it again? Baoq
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Somehow I do net seem to have a patch relating to this thread. Can
> you please send it again? Baoqiu, you agree that this should be
> applied?
Here is is.
diff --git a/lisp/org-docbook.el b/lisp/org-docbook.el
index 8a89675..37851da 100644
--- a/lisp/org-docboo
Hi
Somehow I do net seem to have a patch relating to this thread. Can
you please send it again? Baoqiu, you agree that this should be
applied?
- Carsten
On May 3, 2010, at 9:25 PM, Dale P. Smith wrote:
Baoqiu Cui writes:
Hi Dale,
Dale Smith writes:
Dale Smith writes:
The curre
Baoqiu Cui writes:
> Hi Dale,
>
> Dale Smith writes:
>
>> Dale Smith writes:
>>
>> The current org-export-docbook-xslt-proc-command is a format string,
>> with a fixed order of arguments (the fo filename and then the input
>> docbook filname). Thats probably good enough for most (a
Carsten Dominik writes:
>>> Maybe we could have something like #+XSLT: or so to configure buffer-
>>> local setting for this variable..
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion, Carsten! It's a little hard for me to
>> decide
>> which way is better to specify the stylesheet: "#+XSLT" or "Local
>> V
Baoqiu Cui writes:
> I like %s (for stylesheets). For %p, I guess we can use it to format a
> *set* of parameters.
Yes, that's what I meant.
>> What would be cool is a way to allow the user to *add* custom spec
>> chars to the default set. (hint hint)
>
> Will we make it *too* flexible by doin
Hi Dale,
Dale Smith writes:
> Dale Smith writes:
>
> The current org-export-docbook-xslt-proc-command is a format string,
> with a fixed order of arguments (the fo filename and then the input
> docbook filname). Thats probably good enough for most (all?) xslt
> processors, but
Dale Smith writes:
The current org-export-docbook-xslt-proc-command is a format string,
with a fixed order of arguments (the fo filename and then the input
docbook filname). Thats probably good enough for most (all?) xslt
processors, but things may be more limited when it com
Baoqiu Cui writes:
>>> The current org-export-docbook-xslt-proc-command is a format string,
>>> with a fixed order of arguments (the fo filename and then the input
>>> docbook filname). Thats probably good enough for most (all?) xslt
>>> processors, but things may be more limited when it comes t
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Thanks for the suggestion, Carsten! It's a little hard for me to
>> decide
>> which way is better to specify the stylesheet: "#+XSLT" or "Local
>> Variables:". Maybe "#+XSLT" is better? I don't see many local
>> variables being used in Org mode... Please advise.
>
On May 27, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Baoqiu Cui wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On May 27, 2009, at 2:13 AM, Dale Smith wrote:
Greetings List,
I was suprised an pleased to discover that the docbook exporter has
the ability to apply the stylesheets to transform to fo and to also
process that to pdf
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On May 27, 2009, at 2:13 AM, Dale Smith wrote:
>
>> Greetings List,
>>
>> I was suprised an pleased to discover that the docbook exporter has
>> the ability to apply the stylesheets to transform to fo and to also
>> process that to pdf. Somehing I'd like to see is a doc
16 matches
Mail list logo
