[Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2009-01-12 Thread Paul R
Hi, Scot> I'm impressed at how the new footnote support has managed to put Scot> together readability, stability, ease of use and export-ability yes, I also had a chance to use it and it just worked as expected (I love software that just works). Great job, thanks ! -- Paul _

[Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-18 Thread Sivaram Neelakantan
Carsten Dominik writes: [...] > > Hi Sivaram, I can see how this would be represented in > HTML (just several links to the same footnote), but how > would you represent this in LaTeX? > > - Carsten > > I confess I have no idea. A quick google search on footnote multiple references yielded thi

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-18 Thread Peter Frings
Sorry, let a typo slip in: On Dec 18, 2008, at 11:34 AM, peter.fri...@agfa.com wrote: [snip] labeled: [[fn:label][text]] anonymous: [[fn:]][text]] reference: [[fn:label]] Must of course be: anonymous: [[fn:][text]] Cheers, Peter. ___ Emacs-orgm

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-18 Thread Peter Frings
On Dec 17, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: Paul R writes: * Usage 1, anonymous footnotes [snip] And then we will have that one feature request to cross reference a previous footnote! :-) In the above case, how would a person go about asking someone to refer to an earlier foo

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Dec 17, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: Paul R writes: [...] Can others express their views on pros and cons of the two following usages : * Usage 1, anonymous footnotes Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands from indigenous fighting methods

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-17 Thread Scot Becker
> I really like how elegant > footnote markup is in LaTeX. AUCTeX solves readability problems by > allowing the user to fold footnote macros and by indenting the text of > footnotes when filling paragraphs. I wonder whether something similar > could be implemented in in org-mode (perhaps akin to t

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-17 Thread Matthew Lundin
I was away from my computer for a few hours and was delighted to discover this thread. This truly is an amazing mailing list. "Scot Becker" writes: > I'm torn. > > Usage 1 is harder to read. My footnotes, for example, are very long > compared to your example. Of course, within emacs, this cou

[Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-17 Thread Paul R
Hi, Carsten> Hi Paul, thanks for this latest version! No need for you to Carsten> change anything right now, let me first play with it and seen Carsten> what else I might think off. I really like your idea to use Carsten> [fn:label] and [fn::Full footnote text], nice syntactic sugar. Also, I'm af

[Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-17 Thread Sivaram Neelakantan
Paul R writes: [...] > Can others express their views on pros and cons of the two following > usages : > > * Usage 1, anonymous footnotes > > Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands > from indigenous fighting methods and Chinese kenpō[fn:: Kenpo is the > name of sev

[Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-17 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Paul, thanks for this latest version! No need for you to change anything right now, let me first play with it and seen what else I might think off. I really like your idea to use [fn:label] and [fn::Full footnote text], nice syntactic sugar. - Carsten On Dec 17, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Pau

[Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-17 Thread Scot Becker
I'm torn. Usage 1 is harder to read. My footnotes, for example, are very long compared to your example. Of course, within emacs, this could be made much less severe with a little syntax coloring. It has the advantage that it never gets lost or otherwise mangled without your knowledge, and you d

[Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-17 Thread Paul R
Hi Carsten Carsten> Hi Paul, I think we can easily have both, I can do the coding Carsten> based on your function, this is a small change. Ok so here is the latest version in my .emacs : You'll need (eval-when-compile (require 'cl)) because of rx ... When I wrote this function I wanted to try rx

[Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-17 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Paul, I think we can easily have both, I can do the coding based on your function, this is a small change. - Carsten On Dec 17, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Paul R wrote: Carsten> If Paul agrees, and if he has signed the papers with the FSF, Carsten> we can integrate his code into Org-mode. I d

[Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-17 Thread Paul R
Carsten> If Paul agrees, and if he has signed the papers with the FSF, Carsten> we can integrate his code into Org-mode. I do agree and I do have assigned copyrights to the FSF, but from the technical point of view I would prefer to see plain anonymous footnotes as explained above. I might implem

[Orgmode] Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited

2008-12-17 Thread Paul R
Hi Scot, On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:52:59 +, "Scot Becker" said: Scot> But someone working in Muse did write an interesting extension to Scot> Muse's footnote support. (The extension is explained here [5], and Scot> the revised version of the code is here [6]). It is basically Scot> a hook funct