JBash writes:
> Not sure if this helps, and I don't know the details or the mechanism, but I
> believe that John Wiegley uses org-mode as a bug tracking tool for his
> ledger app.
>
> http://wiki.github.com/jwiegley/ledger
Yup. It's on the file named TODO of the `planning` git branch.
Thanks!
Not sure if this helps, and I don't know the details or the mechanism, but I
believe that John Wiegley uses org-mode as a bug tracking tool for his
ledger app.
http://wiki.github.com/jwiegley/ledger
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Óscar Fuentes writes:
>
> > Using org-mode ins
Óscar Fuentes writes:
> Using org-mode instead of outline-mode is a no-brainer. The only
> incovenient is org's complexity. A basic but effective use of org is
> straightforward but its extensive documentation may seem daunting for
> the occasional user. Maybe a paragraph or two at the beginning
Bastien writes:
>>> Any reasons why this is not a good idea?
>>
>> Just remembered that time ago, when the bug tracker for Emacs was
>> discussed, Bastien proposed to use org-mode for it.
>
> Actually I'm glad you bring this up again, as I want to work on this
> proposal again.
>
> There are act
Óscar Fuentes writes:
> Óscar Fuentes writes:
>
>> Any reasons why this is not a good idea?
>
> Just remembered that time ago, when the bug tracker for Emacs was
> discussed, Bastien proposed to use org-mode for it.
Actually I'm glad you bring this up again, as I want to work on this
proposal
At Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:35:29 -0500, Matthew Lundin wrote:
>
> > I don't know how to deal with attachments.
> > Attachments, for me, are usually ephemeral and usually types of
> > documents I don't particularly like to deal with (typically MS Word or
> > PPT).
>
> I believe org-attach achieves thi
Eric S Fraga writes:
> At Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:25:11 +0200, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>
>> Another nuisance is attached files. This requires an ad-hoc mechanism
>> and I'm not sure I want them stored along with the source files.
>
> Actually, I'm glad you brought this up. Since moving my org files to
At Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:25:11 +0200, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
[...]
> So I calculated what amount of plain text would require a replica of my
> Trac system: it's about 40 MB, with a few thousands tickets. I could
> partitionate this on four unequal parts, though, with the largest being
> 20 MB and 200
Óscar Fuentes writes:
> Any reasons why this is not a good idea?
Just remembered that time ago, when the bug tracker for Emacs was
discussed, Bastien proposed to use org-mode for it. I argued against
because the Emacs bug database would soon fill dozens of megabytes and
this volume does not fit
