[Orgmode] Re: Orgmodeorg-export-generic gives an error

2009-08-10 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:31:19 +0100, James TD Smith > said: JTS> You could use the aput function instead. which does the same thing. It's in JTS> assoc.el which is included with both GNU Emacs and XEmacs. I think that sounds like the easiest approach. Thanks! -- \ Wes Hardaker

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Orgmodeorg-export-generic gives an error

2009-07-23 Thread James TD Smith
On 2009-07-23 09:11:00(+0200), Bastien wrote: > Wes Hardaker writes: > > >> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:59:12 +0200, Bastien > >> said: > > > > B> Those two functions come from alist.el which is included in Apel: > > > > So does that mean it's safe to leave the functions in use within > > org

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Orgmodeorg-export-generic gives an error

2009-07-23 Thread Bastien
Shelagh Manton writes: > On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:13:53 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > >>> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:59:12 +0200, Bastien >>> said: >> >> B> Those two functions come from alist.el which is included in Apel: >> >> So does that mean it's safe to leave the functions in use within

[Orgmode] Re: Orgmodeorg-export-generic gives an error

2009-07-23 Thread Bastien
Wes Hardaker writes: >> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:59:12 +0200, Bastien >> said: > > B> Those two functions come from alist.el which is included in Apel: > > So does that mean it's safe to leave the functions in use within > org-export generic, AFAIK `set-alist' is not defined in vanilla

[Orgmode] Re: Orgmodeorg-export-generic gives an error

2009-07-22 Thread Shelagh Manton
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:13:53 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: >> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:59:12 +0200, Bastien >> said: > > B> Those two functions come from alist.el which is included in Apel: > > So does that mean it's safe to leave the functions in use within > org-export generic, or should I

[Orgmode] Re: Orgmodeorg-export-generic gives an error

2009-07-22 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:59:12 +0200, Bastien > said: B> Those two functions come from alist.el which is included in Apel: So does that mean it's safe to leave the functions in use within org-export generic, or should I replace it with a locally defined slightly-different-named version?

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Orgmodeorg-export-generic gives an error

2009-07-21 Thread Bastien
Shelagh Manton writes: > Someone mentioned in a previous post about a function you use to create a > new org-generic-alist called set-alist which is not known in gnu emacs. > > (defun org-set-generic-type (type definition) > "Adds a TYPE and DEFINITION to the existing list of defined generic >

[Orgmode] Re: Orgmodeorg-export-generic gives an error

2009-07-21 Thread Shelagh Manton
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:39:06 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: >> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:19:19 + (UTC), srinivas >> said: > > s> Nick Dokos suggested the following fix to .emacs: > > s> (if (< emacs-major-version 23) > s> (defun characterp (obj) > s> (and (char-or-string-p obj) (not (strin

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Orgmodeorg-export-generic gives an error

2009-07-20 Thread Bastien
Applied, thanks. Wes Hardaker writes: > This patch to it should fix things: > > diff --git a/lisp/org-export-generic.el b/lisp/org-export-generic.el > index 64dcb1f..c9fc161 100644 > --- a/lisp/org-export-generic.el > +++ b/lisp/org-export-generic.el > @@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ REVERSE means to reve

[Orgmode] Re: Orgmodeorg-export-generic gives an error

2009-07-20 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:19:19 + (UTC), srinivas said: s> Nick Dokos suggested the following fix to .emacs: s> (if (< emacs-major-version 23) s> (defun characterp (obj) s> (and (char-or-string-p obj) (not (stringp obj) s> Inserting this check makes org-export-generic work for me. My