Hi all,
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In fact, we have problems with the Worg publishing process. I don't
> understand it well enough, and Bastien does not seem to find time to
> fix it... :-(
yes, sorry for this.
I've been trying to understand this several times with no s
In fact, we have problems with the Worg publishing process. I don't
understand it well enough, and Bastien does not seem to find time to
fix it... :-(
- Carsten
On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Manish wrote:
Carsten> If a volunteer writes this up, I'd be happy to include it
Carsten> on the o
Carsten> If a volunteer writes this up, I'd be happy to include it
Carsten> on the org-mode pages.
Manish> I have just added "How do I keep current with Org mode
Manish> developement?" to Org FAQ via Worg. Request a review
Manish> for language (English is not my first language.) and
Manish> corr
I believe every hour.
- Carsten
On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:24 AM, Manish wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Manish wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi
If a volunteer writes this up, I'd be happy to include it on the
org-mode pages.
I have just added "How d
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Manish wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > If a volunteer writes this up, I'd be happy to include it on the
> > org-mode pages.
>
> I have just added "How do I keep current with Org mode developement?
Hi Dan,
I know, this is of topic, but I love another software besides Orgmode ;-)
Dan Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well I've started reading that pdf, and it looks like it's going to be
> a good read... But before I go to far, seeing as we're on this topic,
> would someone mind saying a
--- Mer 23/7/08, Dan Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> would someone mind saying a few words about git versus
> other version control systems?
you can watch the video of Linus explaining git:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
cheers
Giovanni
Posta, news, sport, orosco
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Manish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > If a volunteer writes this up, I'd be happy to include it on the
> > org-mode pages.
>
> I have just added "How do I keep current with Org mode developem
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:31:05PM +0530, Manish wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Alan E. Davis wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I trust he will not resent my posting here his instructions
>
> Absolutely not. I am glad it was of some use. :)
>
> One of the best introductions to Git (by n
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi
>
> If a volunteer writes this up, I'd be happy to include it on the
> org-mode pages.
I have just added "How do I keep current with Org mode developement?"
to Org FAQ via Worg. Request a review for language (English is not m
Hi
If a volunteer writes this up, I'd be happy to include it on the org-
mode pages.
- Carsten
On Jul 23, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Alan E. Davis wrote:
I might add a couple of cents' worth. I am clue challenged where it
comes to certain technologies that the users of lists such as this one
seem t
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Alan E. Davis wrote:
[snip]
> I trust he will not resent my posting here his instructions
Absolutely not. I am glad it was of some use. :)
One of the best introductions to Git (by none other than John
Wiegley) can be found here:
http://www.newartisans.com
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> Using the git:// protocol is generally more efficient than http://
> because you are talking to a smart server on the other end that
> can just send the packs you need for your fetch operation.
> http:// is a dumb protocol (in the sen
I might add a couple of cents' worth. I am clue challenged where it
comes to certain technologies that the users of lists such as this one
seem to take for granted. In particular, while I didn't clearly
understand the problem brought up by the original poster, I did have
quite a bit of trouble wi
Using the git:// protocol is generally more efficient than http://
because you are talking to a smart server on the other end that can just
send the packs you need for your fetch operation. http:// is a dumb
protocol (in the sense that there is no program on the other end that
knows anything about
15 matches
Mail list logo
