On 2009-01-05 19:41:09(+0100), Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:31 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>
> >> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 08:23:04 +0100, Carsten Dominik
> >> >> > said:
> >
> > CD> I think it would be better not to use the remember buffer for this,
> > CD> but another, dedi
On Jan 6, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:41:09 +0100, Carsten Dominik > said:
The only benefit to using another buffer is if the person canceled
the
request (ctrl-g) in mid-selection then the original contents of the
remember buffer would be unaltered.
CD> The
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:41:09 +0100, Carsten Dominik
> said:
>> The only benefit to using another buffer is if the person canceled the
>> request (ctrl-g) in mid-selection then the original contents of the
>> remember buffer would be unaltered.
CD> There are more reasons why it matters.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> --
>> "In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
>> and much more difficult to find." -- Terry Pratchett
>
>
> I do love this citation in your signature..
>
Actually, as of last week it should be "Sir Ter
On Jan 5, 2009, at 5:31 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 08:23:04 +0100, Carsten Dominik > said:
CD> I think it would be better not to use the remember buffer for
this,
CD> but another, dedicated, temporary buffer.
Why would it matter though? You're already opening and displayin
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 08:23:04 +0100, Carsten Dominik
> said:
CD> I think it would be better not to use the remember buffer for this,
CD> but another, dedicated, temporary buffer.
Why would it matter though? You're already opening and displaying
it... Granted, you could stop doing that
> On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:45:36 +, James TD Smith
> said:
JTS> I think I'm about 2/3rds of the way through the refactoring and
JTS> adding plist templates.
Thanks for the updates to both of you and I'm very much looking forward
to the new code!
One of the reasons that I have so many
