Hi Daniel, Daniel Clemente wrote: >>> " [(kK)p (sS)ub (C)ncl (i)gn]? ") >>> >>> Some users might ask: >>> kp=? Keep? Keep what? >>> sub=subtract what from what? >>> cncl=cancel command? Why "C" only? >>> ign=ignore what? Why "i" only? > > I also think that interface is difficult to understand. Maybe we should > detail the texts for an easy one.
I'm quite new to (really) clocking my time (4 weeks or so). But I must admit I never know what to answer to the above question, when presented to me. I did not take time to look at it further, being completely under pressure and stress this month. And I currently resolve it by diff'ing my Org times that are under SVN... But that's not clean. > It should express the actions in words that match the user's intention. For > instance, > - account some minutes to that task > - set end time for that task > - discard that partial clocking > - do nothing and leave dangling clock For sure, better words should be chosen. Maybe an extra option (`?') could be added for describing, in one sentence (like you do here), what every possible answer really means. Thanks, Seb -- Sébastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
