Rainer Stengele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I also do not expect to grow Org into anything near a "full" PM.
> But I do would be more than glad to get some basic (trigger or blocker)
> functionality to model dependencies between todos.
I would think that setting these up initially would require
"Eddward DeVilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can't say I have any plans to use triggers, but will they really
> hurt anything? I mean if it makes the code a mess then that wouldn't
> be good. But frankly, I have no need for the GTD 'find a stuck
> project' stuff, and it hasn't been a proble
Well, I think I'm going to try something else to get the task
dependencies I'm after. I'm using a BLOCKED tag now. I'm thinking
I'll go with a BLOCKED property followed by the list of blockers.
I'll probably use links there, but I'll have to find a way to make
that less fragile with the dynamic p
Hi,
I am generally against introducing very specialized features to
org-mode, for the same reasons as described by others in this thread.
The power of org-mode lies in simplicify of the model it offers:
information is a collection of lists that can be queried in various
ways.
This model is simple
On 2007-10-11 22:12 +0100, Rainer Stengele wrote:
> I also do not expect to grow Org into anything near a "full" PM.
> But I do would be more than glad to get some basic (trigger or blocker)
> functionality to model dependencies between todos.
I'd rather org stays as a PIM not PM; there are tons o
Russell Adams schrieb:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 06:10:50PM +0100, pete phillips wrote:
>> I do realise this. But the question that needs to be answered
>> is whether this is necessarily the best path ?
>
> It isn't necessarily. I'm just pointing out it's likely to grow as
> more folks use it for
(Sorry, I'm writing this in my very-early Eurostar, it may not be
accurate at the time it will be sent.)
"Eddward DeVilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm losing track of who proposed what. I was up late last night. I'm
> liking the TRIGGER/BLOCKER idea that Bastien has been talking about,
R
On 10/9/07, Christian Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of org-mode biggest strengths is its simplicity. I do not want it to turn
> into a feature ridden dinosaur that is impossible to maintain.
I was hoping for something more like perl, where the easy things are
easy and the hard things are p
Christian Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To that end my plea is to keep org mode simple. That's why John's
> proposal appeals to me. It is flexible and delegates the complexity to
> emacs lisp instead of inventing another micro language for dependency
> tracking.
Again, I fully agree with tha
Eddward DeVilla gmail.com> writes:
> I've been waiting to see if org might develop something like todo
> dependency ordering. Seems like one could use this with and estimated
> time to complete a todo item to generate a milestone table or more
> easily estimate how long a group of tasks will
10 matches
Mail list logo
