Cezar Halmagean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Aha, thanks for that. Any idea what might be the advantages of using
> Emacs.app over Aquamacs ?
Don't know, since I have never used Aquamacs (I don't have a Mac and
Aquamacs does not support GNUstep). However, I can tell you that Emacs
23 is a lot ni
"Charles philip Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So it seems that Aquamacs (at least for now) is based on Carbon Emacs
> where as Emacs.app's GUI is pure Appkit (Cocoa).
Aha, thanks for that. Any idea what might be the advantages of using
Emacs.app over Aquamacs ?
Cezar
___
Cezar Halmagean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see nothing about Aquamacs there.
,
| Carbon Emacs provides the most recently released version (22.1, June
| 2007) of GNU Emacs for Mac users. Emacs shipped with Leopard is also
| Carbon Emacs (you can complement a dummy Application bundl
"Charles philip Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I found more info comparing the two here:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00293.html
>
I don't see nothing about Aquamacs there.
Cezar
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember
"Charles philip Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is that better than Aquamcs ?
>
> From what I see on the Aquaemacs web page, it is based off Emacs's 22 while
> Emacs.app:
>
> http://emacs-app.sourceforge.net/
>
> is based on the unicode-2 branch of Emacs (now Emacs 23).
I found more info co
Cezar Halmagean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is that better than Aquamcs ?
From what I see on the Aquaemacs web page, it is based off Emacs's 22 while
Emacs.app:
http://emacs-app.sourceforge.net/
is based on the unicode-2 branch of Emacs (now Emacs 23). The main
difference is that Emacs.app h
"Charles philip Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not from every where, but you should be able to define a few terminal
> services (by using emacsclient) in Terminal.app to at least make it work
> with selected file items in Finder.app or capture text put into the
> paste board. However, YMMV si
