Hi Dan,
I have no objection here, please go ahead.
- Carsten
On Mar 28, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
For the sake of non-emacs experts, I think the customization group
"Org Font Lock" would be better named "Org Appearance". Here's what
part of
the org-customize buffer currently loo
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:04:16 -0400, Dan Davison wrote:
> Right, when being friendly to new users is the purpose of customize.
> A further argument that "Font Lock" is a misnomer is that "Org Odd
> Levels Only" is not related to font lock. It could be put in Structure,
> but I think the decision to
> A further argument that "Font Lock" is a misnomer is that "Org Odd
> Levels Only" is not related to font lock. It could be put in Structure,
Sorry, what I should have said is that it *is* also in the Structure
group :) but I believe that the point still stands, as it is much more
to do with appe
Xiao-Yong Jin writes:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:14:49 -0400, Dan Davison wrote:
>
>> For the sake of non-emacs experts, I think the customization group
>> "Org Font Lock" would be better named "Org Appearance". Here's what part of
>> the org-customize buffer currently looks like:
>
Hi Xiao-Yong,
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:14:49 -0400, Dan Davison wrote:
> For the sake of non-emacs experts, I think the customization group
> "Org Font Lock" would be better named "Org Appearance". Here's what part of
> the org-customize buffer currently looks like:
I wouldn't invent some new terminology apart f
For the sake of non-emacs experts, I think the customization group
"Org Font Lock" would be better named "Org Appearance". Here's what part of
the org-customize buffer currently looks like:
[+]-- Group Org TODO
[+]-- Group Org Time
[+]-- Group Org Tags
[+]-- Group Org Properties
[+]
