Hi Carsten,
I'm using Org-mode 6.33f under GNU Emacs 22.1.1 and Windows XP Pro SP3.
In one of my Org files, I have the line:
#+TYP_TODO: TODO NEXT WAIT PROJ | DONE NODO
But I find that, in the snippet below for example, tasks b and c are not
dependency-blocked, i.e. I can switch them to DONE
Hi Chris, I am not able to reproduce this.
these are blocked just fine for me, at least the first time I try. If
I try again immediately, the entries do switch to other non-done
states, but not to DONE.
- Carsten
On Jan 11, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Chris Randle wrote:
Hi Carsten,
I'm using
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Chris, I am not able to reproduce this.
I can reproduce it [beware, with 6.33trans 2010-01-08 version!]
Carsten, I will update to 6.34trans in few minutes and post
the results.
Org-mode version 6.33trans (6.33trans)
GNU Emacs
Giovanni Ridolfi giovanni.rido...@yahoo.it writes:
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Chris, I am not able to reproduce this.
I can reproduce it with the latest version:
Org-mode version 6.34 (trans 2010-01-12 15:00 CET)
GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of
At Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:08:08 +0100,
Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
Giovanni Ridolfi giovanni.rido...@yahoo.it writes:
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Chris, I am not able to reproduce this.
I can reproduce it with the latest version:
Org-mode version 6.34 (trans
David Maus maus.da...@gmail.com writes:
At Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:08:08 +0100,
Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
Giovanni Ridolfi giovanni.rido...@yahoo.it writes:
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Chris, I am not able to reproduce this.
I can reproduce it with the latest version:
On Jan 11, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
David Maus maus.da...@gmail.com writes:
At Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:08:08 +0100,
Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
Giovanni Ridolfi giovanni.rido...@yahoo.it writes:
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Chris, I am not able to
And the parent could also support the [%] notation that exists for
checkboxes :)
-Hugo
On Jan 25, 2008 12:45 PM, Stuart McLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if I have started a new thread on this subject, GMail and I are
not getting along right now.
** TODO a main project
*** TODO
Hi
I am curious why I never got any feedback on this implementation
of task dependencies. Did people overlook this? Or is the need
for dependencies not as pressing as some of you thought?
- Carsten
On Oct 19, 2007, at 8:27 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Oct 11, 2007, at 16:46, Carsten
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi
I am curious why I never got any feedback on this implementation
of task dependencies. Did people overlook this? Or is the need
for dependencies not as pressing as some of you thought?
I guess maybe not. Or maybe we all
On Jan 21, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi
I am curious why I never got any feedback on this implementation
of task dependencies. Did people overlook this? Or is the need
for dependencies not as pressing as some of
On Oct 11, 2007, at 16:46, Carsten Dominik wrote:
- concerning the TRIGGER proposal by John, and the TRIGGER/BLOCKER
functionality
discussed later: In Emacs terms, this seems to translate into a
*hook*
that is called at the right moment. I'd say that a single hook is
enough.
The right
12 matches
Mail list logo
