Done, thanks.
I am using -no-site-file instead of --no-site-file, this seems to
works best
with different Emacsen..
- Carsten
On May 4, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
David Bremner brem...@unb.ca writes:
is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
emacs -Q
At Sun, 3 May 2009 21:52:05 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
emacs
-Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I
am not even
On May 4, 2009, at 2:17 PM, David Bremner wrote:
At Sun, 3 May 2009 21:52:05 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
emacs
-Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
this is a good idea, but -Q
David Bremner brem...@unb.ca writes:
is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I am not
even sure about Emacs 22.
at least for Emacs 22, it works. XEmacs
[D'oh: I replied to Carsten only - sorry about that.]
--- Forwarded Message
Date:Sun, 03 May 2009 16:27:15 -0400
From:Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com
To: Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com
cc: nicholas.do...@hp.com
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Why not emacs -Q for
Hi all,
is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not emacs
-Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
I use a lot of elisp addons, so loading the site-lisp files takes quite
some time and some packages like CEDET even print messages while loading
and obfuscate the compile output. I
On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Hi all,
is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not
emacs
-Q for byte-compiling org-mode?
Hi Tassilo,
this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I
am not even sure about Emacs 22.
- Carsten
I
