On Jun 14, 2007, at 17:02, pete phillips wrote:
John == John Rakestraw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John In response to which, Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user
want to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used.
John I
On Jun 14, 2007, at 17:43, Rick Moynihan wrote:
pete phillips wrote:
John == John Rakestraw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John In response to which, Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If
user
want to move the item deeper,
On 6/15/07, Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 14, 2007, at 17:02, pete phillips wrote:
John == John Rakestraw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John In response to which, Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user
want to move
On 6/15/07, Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I did notice that extra bit in your proposal. However,
I think it will easily lead to unwanted behavior as well:
** heading
- item 1
- item 2
- item 3
will get you:
** heading
- item 1
- item 2
forwarded to the list (because I mistakenly sent it first only to
Carsten).
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:25:27 -0400
From: John Rakestraw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] an annoying indentation
Hi Carsten --
Carsten Dominik
- Carsten Dominik (2007-06-14) wrote:-
*** headline
- item 1
- item 2
here we have some text
- item 3
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user want
to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used.
--
Leo sdl.web AT gmail.com
- Carsten Dominik (2007-06-14) wrote:-
*** headline
- item 1
- item 2
here we have some text
- item 3
In response to which, Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user want
to move the item deeper,
On 6/14/07, Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Carsten Dominik (2007-06-14) wrote:-
*** headline
- item 1
- item 2
here we have some text
- item 3
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user want
to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used.
John == John Rakestraw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John In response to which, Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user
want to move the item deeper, 'M-right' can be used.
John I agree with Leo -- or, rather, his
On 6/14/07, Rick Moynihan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pete phillips wrote:
John == John Rakestraw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John In response to which, Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think '- item 3' still should be aligned to '- item 2'. If user
want to move the item deeper,
Dear list,
Anyone else find the following annoying?
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Best,
--
Leo sdl.web AT gmail.com (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)
Hi Leo
On 6/12/07, Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else find the following annoying?
Yes, but...
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
... I reported this to the list last week and Carsten
On Jun 12, 2007, at 17:13, Leo wrote:
Dear list,
Anyone else find the following annoying?
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
The question I have is: why would you press TAB if not to indent?
-
Leo wrote:
Dear list,
Anyone else find the following annoying?
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Best,
I must admit I do run into this on occasion and it is a little annoying.
It would (IMHO) be
On 6/12/07, Rick Moynihan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo wrote:
Dear list,
Anyone else find the following annoying?
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes,
*** heading 1
- item 1
- item 2
Best,
I must admit I do run into this
15 matches
Mail list logo