On Apr 13, 2008, at 8:48 PM, T. V. Raman wrote:
two suggestions:
1) accept paths like ./foo.html as local links.
This is now allowed.
2) Augment C-c C-l to react to file: by providing filename
completion relative to the working directory.
This is hard and therefore not yet
I've not tried http:foo.html -- but I suggest doing that to
author a relative URL is a bad idea.
I tried ./foo.html and that didn't work either. One compromise
would be to get ./foo.html to link to a relative url, while
foo.html continues to link to a local anchor
Carsten == Carsten Dominik
On Apr 13, 2008, at 5:33 PM, T. V. Raman wrote:
I've not tried http:foo.html -- but I suggest doing that to
author a relative URL is a bad idea.
Can you explain why you think that this is a bad idea?
Educate me! What is wrong with writing http:foo.html ??
- Carsten
I tried
I think writing http:foo.html is a bad idea because typing that
string in other contexts is sort of meaningless as a URL.
Until now, everything one types in org-mode sort of has meaning
elsewhere. If you want it to look like a url in this case too
then I'd suggest file:foo.html -- rther than
H,
this is *such* a good idea, that I will implement this retroactively
into all versions since ... 2.0 or so? Abracadabra! Done.
In fact, it has been working just so for a very long time.
file:foo.html - href=foo.html
file:foo.org- href=foo.html
The second line assumes that the
two suggestions:
1) accept paths like ./foo.html as local links.
2) Augment C-c C-l to react to file: by providing filename
completion relative to the working directory.
The emacs binding to the w3m browser does this if you type file: in the
minibuffer
when prompted for a URL.
Carsten ==
Hi Raman,
On Apr 13, 2008, at 8:48 PM, T. V. Raman wrote:
two suggestions:
1) accept paths like ./foo.html as local links.
I will look into this. The problem is the system dependence
of file names, so I am not sure what a good solution would be
that would work on Windows as well as on
On Apr 13, 2008, at 10:32 PM, T. V. Raman wrote:
file:// urls are already designed to be platform independent.
So an org file should never carry in it a path like a\\b\\c.html
-- we should always use a/b/c.html
since that's the syntax used by relative URLs.
Yes, but while an Org file is
Hi,
org-export turns links of the form
[[foo][link to relative url foo]]
ends up creating links of the form
a href=#foo.../a
this means that it becomes impossible to write hyperlinks that
are relative URLs.
--
Best Regards,
--raman
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:
On Apr 13, 2008, at 6:49 AM, T. V. Raman wrote:
Hi,
org-export turns links of the form
[[foo][link to relative url foo]]
ends up creating links of the form
a href=#foo.../a
this means that it becomes impossible to write hyperlinks that
are relative URLs.
Hi Raman,
the url goes into the
10 matches
Mail list logo
