At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:47:43 +0200,
Sebastian Rose wrote:
>
> Hi Eric and Stefan,
>
> I push the results of this thread to
>
> http://orgmode.org/org-hacks.html#compiling-org-without-make
Thanks Sebastian.
> This will be available only in one or two hours. If you follow worg.git,
> feel free
Stefan Vollmar writes:
> Dear Sebastian,
>
> On 09.07.2009, at 20:25, Sebastian Rose wrote:
>
>> this works here with `emacs -Q'
>>
>> we forgot the load path
>> The function is likely to change some more. I just send this version, so
>> you can compile this way (hopefully).
>
>
> EXCELL
Dear Sebastian,
On 09.07.2009, at 20:25, Sebastian Rose wrote:
this works here with `emacs -Q'
we forgot the load path
The function is likely to change some more. I just send this
version, so
you can compile this way (hopefully).
EXCELLENT - we now have an up-to-date org-mode e
Hi Eric and Stefan,
I push the results of this thread to
http://orgmode.org/org-hacks.html#compiling-org-without-make
This will be available only in one or two hours. If you follow worg.git,
feel free to pull and edit it (Eric, you're a worger, aren't you?). That
way we don't have to send th
Hello Stefan,
this works here with `emacs -Q'
we forgot the load path
The function is likely to change some more. I just send this version, so
you can compile this way (hopefully).
Sebastian
binZI12hwAFZV.bin
Description: application/emacs-lisp
Stefan Vollmar writes:
> Gentlemen,
>
> we have tried the lisp-version for updating a the plain vanilla MS Windows
> emacs
> (http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows) and I think we are almost there -
> thanks
> for all the help so far!
>
> When running make update on MacOS X with Aquamacs 1.8b I
Gentlemen,
we have tried the lisp-version for updating a the plain vanilla MS
Windows emacs (http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows) and I think we
are almost there - thanks for all the help so far!
When running make update on MacOS X with Aquamacs 1.8b I get lots of
warnings about "functio
At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:19:52 +0200,
Sebastian Rose wrote:
> Here is the same with some more additions.
many thanks! Yes, the missing / was an error I noted just after sending the
email...
> As a next step, we could as well drop the usage of dired, right?
that would make sense!
I'll play aroun
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Hello again,
Thanks Eric!
Here is the same with some more additions.
1.) Ensure a slash is appended to the directory (i.e. do not create
~/.emacs.d/org/lisporg-install.el)
2.) Optionally, do not compile the sources, but create the
org-install.el file. Will this wo
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Hello again,
>
> Although Sebastian's elisp code was perfect for batch compiling the
> lisp/*.el files in the org distribution, it doesn't address one key
> element of the make step required: the creation of the
> org-install.el file.
I wonder where I have that file. I cou
Hello again,
Although Sebastian's elisp code was perfect for batch compiling the
lisp/*.el files in the org distribution, it doesn't address one key
element of the make step required: the creation of the
org-install.el file.
I've (with my rather rudimentary elisp skills) modified the function
as
11 matches
Mail list logo
