On Jun 13, 2008, at 11:24 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:18:52AM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jun 12, 2008, at 1:47 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
Well, I agree that there may not be a good definition, in which
case a
per-event property disabling export of the RRULE would be
On Jun 12, 2008, at 1:47 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
Well, I agree that there may not be a good definition, in which case a
per-event property disabling export of the RRULE would be a perfect
solution.
Hi Adam,
I do not feel comfortable with this specialized filtering, so I am not
implementing
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:28:48PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2008, at 11:24 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >The motivation is that while I very much like org's functionality for
> >automatically updating the timestamp on a repeated task once it has
> >been marked as done, I do not want t
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:18:52AM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2008, at 1:47 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >Well, I agree that there may not be a good definition, in which case a
> >per-event property disabling export of the RRULE would be a perfect
> >solution.
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> I do no
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:54:04PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:02:48AM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> >>On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >>
> >>>Currently, if I have a repeated task such as
> >>>
>
On Jun 12, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:02:48AM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
Currently, if I have a repeated task such as
* NEXT [#B] water plants
SCHEDULED: <2008-06-16 Mon 10:30-10:45 .+1w>
then iCal ex
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:02:48AM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>
> >Currently, if I have a repeated task such as
> >
> >* NEXT [#B] water plants
> > SCHEDULED: <2008-06-16 Mon 10:30-10:45 .+1w>
> >
> >then iCal export includes something like thi
I don't think the icalendar format does support repeated entries for a
limited time interval, does it?
- Carsten
On Jun 10, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
Currently, if I have a repeated task such as
* NEXT [#B] water plants
SCHEDULED: <2008-06-16 Mon 10:30-10:45 .+1w>
then iCal ex
Currently, if I have a repeated task such as
* NEXT [#B] water plants
SCHEDULED: <2008-06-16 Mon 10:30-10:45 .+1w>
then iCal export includes something like this in the VEVENT:
RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;INTERVAL=1
For most repeated tasks, this is a perfectly sensible default.
However, for a task of
