Sounds good. Thanks!
On 7/10/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately I have also not found a better solution. So
it now should use the base buffer, and widen it if necessary.
- Carsten
On Mar 28, 2007, at 0:34, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I found a bug involving
Unfortunately I have also not found a better solution. So
it now should use the base buffer, and widen it if necessary.
- Carsten
On Mar 28, 2007, at 0:34, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
Hi,
I found a bug involving indirect buffers when following links. If
I have one file with a link to a second
Hi,
I found a bug involving indirect buffers when following links. If
I have one file with a link to a second file and I have that second
file opened with an indirect buffer narrowed such that the link is not
contained in the narrowed region, org may fail to follow the link.
Basically, if
There are two issues here:
The first is when you want to *store* a link to a file-less buffer,
using `C-c l'.
This should be an error, because links are for the future and if there
is no file, there is no point linking to it. Org-mode is throwing
an error, but there is a bug if the file-less buf
Hi,
I'm not on the latest version yet and it will be a few day until I
can get there. However, I found a bug in 4.51 when trying to store a
link using C-c C-l. I believe that's org-insert-link. In any case
org-insert-link gets called in there somewhere and dies calling
(file-truename buffer
