Hi Jack,
Jack Kamm writes:
>> I've seen you update the NEWS entry, which is good: is there a way to
>> present the enhancements in the "* New features" section? If you feel
>> like it, please advertize the enhancements there too.
>
> Given John's feedback, I now think it's better to put off thi
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 3:46 PM Jack Kamm wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> John Kitchin writes:
>
> > I can see why you would want to see True/False there, but to get the
> value,
> > you need to specifically return what you want because AFAIK the body is
> > wrapped in a function that is evaluated to get
Hi John,
John Kitchin writes:
> I can see why you would want to see True/False there, but to get the value,
> you need to specifically return what you want because AFAIK the body is
> wrapped in a function that is evaluated to get the value, it is not simply
> the last thing that gets evaluated.
I can see why you would want to see True/False there, but to get the value,
you need to specifically return what you want because AFAIK the body is
wrapped in a function that is evaluated to get the value, it is not simply
the last thing that gets evaluated. Your example clarified to me at least
wh
Hi Bastien,
> I've seen you update the NEWS entry, which is good: is there a way to
> present the enhancements in the "* New features" section? If you feel
> like it, please advertize the enhancements there too.
Given John's feedback, I now think it's better to put off this change to
9.5, if at
Hi John,
John Kitchin writes:
> I think None is correct. If you don't specify a return value in Python,
> then a function returns None. I would expect that to happen in a Python
> block too.
Hmm, OK, thanks for your intuition, it's useful feedback.
Working this out loud, I was considering the
Hi Jack,
Jack Kamm writes:
> Below is a very small patch to Python session blocks, to make them
> return a blank result (empty string) instead of None when there is no
> return value.
>
> Normally I would push this myself, but since we are so close to 9.4, I
> thought it prudent to mail a patch
I think None is correct. If you don't specify a return value in Python,
then a function returns None. I would expect that to happen in a Python
block too.
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon Univers
Hi,
Below is a very small patch to Python session blocks, to make them
return a blank result (empty string) instead of None when there is no
return value.
Normally I would push this myself, but since we are so close to 9.4, I
thought it prudent to mail a patch and let the maintainers handle it. I
