Thank you for your hard work on this. It's definitely easier to compare two
concrete blocks of code rather than abstract ideas.
> I agree with you that my solution is somewhat intrusive. Ideally, I would
> > have preferred that my solution could leverage advice functions or some
> Org
> > hook,
Hi Nicolas,
Hi All,
On Sun, 05 Jul 2020 at 17:49, Gustavo Barros
wrote:
A fourth issue is point placement after the emphasis is
added. `org-emphasis'
takes a stance here and places point within the emphasis. I do agree
with this
option, but it is still true that sometimes, one might want
Hi Nicolas,
Hi All,
On Sun, 05 Jul 2020 at 07:50, Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
The problem is not your implementation, really. It's just that I don't
think it should be the _built-in_ way to solve emphasis
management. IOW,
we shouldn't need to activate a minor mode to make that management
Hello,
Shankar Rao writes:
> I agree with you that my solution is somewhat intrusive. Ideally, I would
> have preferred that my solution could leverage advice functions or some Org
> hook, so that I wouldn't have to modify org.el, but it doesn't seem like
> there is a straightforward way to do
Hi,
I wrote my message in a hurry. Let me clarify it.
>
> I'm only talking about built-in tooling. I don't mind if a user have the
> feature you're proposing, of course, as it is not wrong per se.
>
> However, I believe that's not the best solution for the problem we're
> trying to solve. I think
Hello,
Shankar Rao writes:
> I agree that if org-emphasize handled marker visibility states in a DWIM
> fashion, then a user should not need to display them, but why do you
> believe they shouldn't have the opportunity, especially given that this is
> the exact behavior of
Hi Nicolas,
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 12:46, Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
Hello,
Gustavo Barros writes:
You have a good point here. When I made the suggestion I was naively
thinking the featured could be plugged/hooked somewhere in Org, when
fontification is done. But that's not really true,
> Sorry for being late to the party, but, IMO, this doesn't sound like
> a right approach to the problem of invisible emphasis markers. A user
> choosing to hide emphasis markers should not need to—or even be given
> the opportunity to—display them in order to edit them efficiently.
>
I agree
Hello,
Gustavo Barros writes:
> You have a good point here. When I made the suggestion I was naively
> thinking the featured could be plugged/hooked somewhere in Org, when
> fontification is done. But that's not really true, as the feature
> requires being run every time the point moves too.
Hi Shankar,
Detailed comments are up for Kyle, or someone more qualified than
myself, but I leave one further comment regarding the suggestion I had
made.
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 09:53, Shankar Rao wrote:
I agree that adding this functionality as additional options to
Kyle, Gustavo,
Thank you both for your detailed feedback. Attached is a new version of the
patch that incorporates most of your suggestions.
>> I have not yet signed the papers assigning copyright to the FSF. I sent
> a
> >> request for the papers to ass...@gnu.org, but have not yet received a
Gustavo Barros writes:
> Just an user here, but I'd like to leave my +1 to this proposed feature.
> [...]
Thanks. That's very useful feedback.
> I can add another thought on the matter. While prettify-symbols is a
> mode, org-hide-emphasis-markers is an option/variable. So I wonder if
> the
Hi Kyle, Hi Shankar,
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 05:40, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Shankar Rao writes:
>
>> This patch adds a minor mode that makes emphasis markers be automatically
>> unhidden when the point is inside the region of emphasis and then the
>> markers are rehidden when the point is moved
t;> This code was adapted from prettify-symbols-mode in prog-mode.el
>>
>> I have not yet signed the papers assigning copyright to the FSF. I sent a
>> request for the papers to ass...@gnu.org, but have not yet received a
>> response.
Are you still waiting for a response
Sorry, I've never submitted a patch before. Looking through this mailing
list, I see that you're supposed to attach the .patch file to the e-mail,
so here it is.
This patch adds a minor mode that makes emphasis markers be automatically
unhidden when the point is inside the region of emphasis and
* lisp/org.el:
(org-auto-emphasis-unhide-at-point): Parameter that controls the
behavior of Org Auto Emphasis mode. It can be one of the values nil, t, and
'right-edge, and works similarly to the parameter
`prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point' for `prettify-symbols-mode'.
16 matches
Mail list logo
