Ihor Radchenko writes:
> The attached patch is fixing a rather annoying problem when
> org-latex-pdf-process is set to a list. Currently, only output of the
> last command in the list is preserved in *Org PDF LaTeX output* buffer,
> which sometimes prevents ox-latex from detecting compilation
Max Nikulin writes:
> On 22/05/2022 10:51, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>>
>> The attached patch is fixing a rather annoying problem when
>> org-latex-pdf-process is set to a list. Currently, only output of the
>> last command in the list is preserved in *Org PDF LaTeX output* buffer,
>> which
Daniel Fleischer writes:
> Ihor Radchenko [2022-05-22 Sun 11:51] wrote:
>
>> The attached patch is fixing a rather annoying problem when
>> org-latex-pdf-process is set to a list. Currently, only output of the
>> last command in the list is preserved in *Org PDF LaTeX output* buffer,
>> which
On 22/05/2022 10:51, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
The attached patch is fixing a rather annoying problem when
org-latex-pdf-process is set to a list. Currently, only output of the
last command in the list is preserved in *Org PDF LaTeX output* buffer,
which sometimes prevents ox-latex from detecting
This is very useful, especially being able to see the output of BiBTeX,
say. Thank you.
--
: Eric S Fraga, with org release_9.5.3-508-ge268e4 in Emacs 29.0.50
Ihor Radchenko [2022-05-22 Sun 11:51] wrote:
> The attached patch is fixing a rather annoying problem when
> org-latex-pdf-process is set to a list. Currently, only output of the
> last command in the list is preserved in *Org PDF LaTeX output* buffer,
> which sometimes prevents ox-latex from
Hi,
The attached patch is fixing a rather annoying problem when
org-latex-pdf-process is set to a list. Currently, only output of the
last command in the list is preserved in *Org PDF LaTeX output* buffer,
which sometimes prevents ox-latex from detecting compilation warnings.
ox-latex relies on
