Re: [PATCH] Clarify that REST is not supported on the start TIME in a time-range timestamp.

2023-10-04 Thread Ihor Radchenko
"Tom Alexander" writes: > Potentially related, org-mode is accepting this malformed timestamp from[1]: > ``` > <2016-02-14 Sun ++y> > ``` > > The org-mode documentation[2] only includes REST with TIME, defining TIME as > "H:MMREST". The above does not have any TIME but it accepts the timestamp

Re: [PATCH] Clarify that REST is not supported on the start TIME in a time-range timestamp.

2023-10-02 Thread Tom Alexander
Potentially related, org-mode is accepting this malformed timestamp from[1]: ``` <2016-02-14 Sun ++y> ``` The org-mode documentation[2] only includes REST with TIME, defining TIME as "H:MMREST". The above does not have any TIME but it accepts the timestamp anyway: ``` (timestamp :type active

[PATCH] Clarify that REST is not supported on the start TIME in a time-range timestamp.

2023-10-02 Thread Tom Alexander
If REST is included in the first TIME on a time-range timestamp then the entire timestamp becomes a single range-less timestamp. To test I used the following test document: ``` [1970-01-01 Thu 8:15-13:15foo] [1970-01-01 Thu 8:15foo-13:15] ``` The first line parses as a timerange from