Jim Porter writes:
> On 9/25/2021 10:58 PM, Bastien wrote:
>> I applied the patch adding the TINYCHANGE cookie, since the assignment
>> process isn't done yet. Can you check with copyright-cl...@fsf.org if
>> it will be done anytime soon?
>
> I think I might be in the database as "James" though;
On 9/25/2021 10:58 PM, Bastien wrote:
I applied the patch adding the TINYCHANGE cookie, since the assignment
process isn't done yet. Can you check with copyright-cl...@fsf.org if
it will be done anytime soon?
Hm, it should be done, since I received confirmation from the copyright
clerk on the
Hi Jim,
Jim Porter writes:
> The attached patch fixes both of these issues. For the first problem,
> maybe it would be useful to put the regexp for checkboxes in a variable
> somewhere so it doesn't get out of sync. I wasn't sure though, so I went
> with the simpler solution for now.
Applied
On 9/18/2021 1:54 PM, Samuel Wales wrote:
thanks for this. if tests are written, might be useful to include the
case where half-checked are parents.
I tested manually, and this behaves how I'd expect; not surprising,
since it just calls `org-toggle-checkbox'. Maybe there's an argument
that p
thanks for this. if tests are written, might be useful to include the
case where half-checked are parents.
On 9/18/21, Jim Porter wrote:
> While trying out `org-mouse', I noticed two semi-related issues with
> checkboxes. First, intermediate-state checkboxes (like [-]) aren't
> clickable. Second
While trying out `org-mouse', I noticed two semi-related issues with
checkboxes. First, intermediate-state checkboxes (like [-]) aren't
clickable. Second, if the checkboxes are inside a block and the theme
gives the block a background color, the block's background is removed
behind the checkbox
