Re: [PATCH] In case of Sly, let org-babel-execute:lisp use Slynk instead of Swank

2023-05-02 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Ihor Radchenko writes: >> The patch is against main only because it overlaps a region where bugfix >> and main diverged. I am willing to provide a similar patch against >> main. > > I do not think that we in a hurry to put this onto bugfix. > Bugfix is just for trivial and critical fixes. >

Re: [PATCH] In case of Sly, let org-babel-execute:lisp use Slynk instead of Swank

2023-03-30 Thread Ihor Radchenko
gerard.vermeu...@posteo.net writes: >> I'd appreciate if other ob-lisp users could test the patch with both >> SLY >> and SLIME. >> >> I have no comments on the Elisp part of the patch. > > I have a few additional remarks: > > The patch is against main only because it overlaps a region where

Re: [PATCH] In case of Sly, let org-babel-execute:lisp use Slynk instead of Swank

2023-03-29 Thread gerard . vermeulen
On 29.03.2023 11:42, Ihor Radchenko wrote: gerard.vermeu...@posteo.net writes: The Emacs integrated development environments Slime and Sly communicate by means of similar RPC protocols with different server programs: Swank in case of Slime and Slynk in case of Sly. However, the code in

Re: [PATCH] In case of Sly, let org-babel-execute:lisp use Slynk instead of Swank

2023-03-29 Thread Ihor Radchenko
gerard.vermeu...@posteo.net writes: > The Emacs integrated development environments Slime and Sly > communicate by means of similar RPC protocols with different server > programs: Swank in case of Slime and Slynk in case of Sly. However, > the code in org-babel-execute:lisp always expects to

[PATCH] In case of Sly, let org-babel-execute:lisp use Slynk instead of Swank

2023-03-29 Thread gerard . vermeulen
Hello, The Emacs integrated development environments Slime and Sly communicate by means of similar RPC protocols with different server programs: Swank in case of Slime and Slynk in case of Sly. However, the code in org-babel-execute:lisp always expects to talk with Swank because of the