> The issue with that is that it reintroduces the thing the patch is
> trying to fix, as it considers any partially invisible line as fully
> invisible (while the opposite should be the case).
Oops. Sorry, I wrote that function without much thinking.
Indeed, it should be
(defun org--line-visible-
>> + (mapcar #'org-invisible-p
>> + (number-sequence (line-beginning-position)
>> + (1- (line-end-position)
>
> This is a bad idea. org--line-visible-p will be called for every single
> invisible headline. If you check every single point at every sin
> + (mapcar #'org-invisible-p
> + (number-sequence (line-beginning-position)
> + (1- (line-end-position)
This is a bad idea. org--line-visible-p will be called for every single
invisible headline. If you check every single point at every single
i
> I do not think that setting visibility the leading stars is a correct
> approach to control the movement commands. After second though about the
> issue you raised in the first email, I think that it would make more
> sense for org-forward-heading-same-level to check if any part of the
> heading
