Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian Miele writes:
> Part of me feels that I should find a better explanation and spare you
> the trouble of figuring out what I mean. But there seems to be no
> (significantly) better explanation I can come up with without going to
> greater lengths and especially investing
Sebastian Miele writes:
> Bastien writes:
> >
> > Sebastian Miele writes:
> >
> > > I am quite certain, that the content indentation conceptually and
> > > technically belongs to the buffer containing the src block.
> >
> > Sorry, I think I got confused - let's call buffer-A the one with the
>
Bastien writes:
>
> Sebastian Miele writes:
>
> > I am quite certain, that the content indentation conceptually and
> > technically belongs to the buffer containing the src block.
>
> Sorry, I think I got confused - let's call buffer-A the one with the
> "#+begin_src ... #+end_src" string and
Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian Miele writes:
> I am quite certain, that the content indentation conceptually and
> technically belongs to the buffer containing the src block.
Sorry, I think I got confused - let's call buffer-A the one with the
"#+begin_src ... #+end_src" string and buffer-B the one
Hi Bastien,
Bastien writes:
>
> Sebastian Miele writes:
>
> > * lisp/org-src.el (org-src--contents-for-write-back): Use the
> > potentially buffer-local value of `org-edit-src-content-indentation'
> > from the source buffer instead of that from the editing buffer.
>
> I'm not sure about I see
Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian Miele writes:
> * lisp/org-src.el (org-src--contents-for-write-back): Use the
> potentially buffer-local value of `org-edit-src-content-indentation'
> from the source buffer instead of that from the editing buffer.
I'm not sure about I see why this patch would be
Hello,
Sebastian Miele writes:
> That's perfectly fine with me. An updated patch is attached.
Applied. I removed the ORG-NEWS entry because it is more a bugfix than
anything else.
Thank you.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
ate: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 01:00:50 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Respect buffer-local value of
`org-edit-src-content-indentation'
* lisp/org-src.el (org-src--content-indentation): Introduce
permanently buffer-local variable for storing away the potentially
buffer-local value of `org-edit-src-content-indentati
Hello,
Sebastian Miele writes:
> The Org default of org-edit-src-content-indentation is 2. I like that
> value and leave it that way. Worg's root .dir-locals sets it to 0
> buffer-locally in at least many Worg's Org files. Hence, when I edit an
> src block in a Worg file, the value of
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Sebastian Miele writes:
>
>> Subject: [PATCH] Respect buffer-local value of
>> `org-edit-src-content-indentation'
>>
>> * lisp/org-src.el (org-src--contents-for-write-back): Use the
>> potentially buffer-local value
Hello,
Sebastian Miele writes:
> Subject: [PATCH] Respect buffer-local value of
> `org-edit-src-content-indentation'
>
> * lisp/org-src.el (org-src--contents-for-write-back): Use the
> potentially buffer-local value of `org-edit-src-content-indentation'
> from the sou
Respect buffer-local value of
`org-edit-src-content-indentation'
* lisp/org-src.el (org-src--contents-for-write-back): Use the
potentially buffer-local value of `org-edit-src-content-indentation'
from the source buffer instead of that from the editing buffer.
---
etc/ORG-NEWS| 4
lisp
Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian Miele writes:
> * lisp/org-src.el (org-src--contents-for-write-back): Use the
> potentially buffer-local value of `org-edit-src-content-indentation'
> from the source buffer instead of that from the editing buffer.
> ---
> lisp/org-src.el | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2
* lisp/org-src.el (org-src--contents-for-write-back): Use the
potentially buffer-local value of `org-edit-src-content-indentation'
from the source buffer instead of that from the editing buffer.
---
lisp/org-src.el | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
14 matches
Mail list logo
