Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Max Nikulin writes:
>
>>> The proposed FAQ entry is overwhelming. It would work fine as a blog,
>>
>> A blog with a couple of posts a year has a little sense. Moreover it is
>> closer to a wiki article because it is supposed to be updated. That is
>> why I asked for
On 01/07/2023 22:24, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
FAQ is probably fine. We may add a CSS there that will fold the
answers by default.
When all entries are opened, it is possible to use search in browser. I
am against the idea of hiding answers. However the table of contents,
Max Nikulin writes:
>> FAQ is probably fine. We may add a CSS there that will fold the
>> answers by default.
>
> When all entries are opened, it is possible to use search in browser. I
> am against the idea of hiding answers. However the table of contents,
> that is rather long and revealed
Max Nikulin writes:
>> The proposed FAQ entry is overwhelming. It would work fine as a blog,
>
> A blog with a couple of posts a year has a little sense. Moreover it is
> closer to a wiki article because it is supposed to be updated. That is
> why I asked for an alternative location on Worg
On 29/06/2023 17:47, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
I think, it is time to add a FAQ entry, see the attachment.
The proposed FAQ entry is overwhelming. It would work fine as a blog,
A blog with a couple of posts a year has a little sense. Moreover it is
closer to a wiki article
Max Nikulin writes:
>>> Could it be possible to make inline comments (# something like this) ?
> ...
>> Previous discussion:
> ...
>
> I think, it is time to add a FAQ entry, see the attachment.
The proposed FAQ entry is overwhelming. It would work fine as a blog,
but not as a quick answer to a
an idea of another
place on Worg where such tricks may be added then, please, share it.From a8dd1797588bdab7f63628579414c65d7444f387 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Max Nikulin
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 22:40:40 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] org-faq.org: Inline comments
* org-faq.org (Export): New heading
