Evgenii Klimov writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> It looks like 5 working days have passed since your email to FSF. If so,
>> please follow up once and wait another 5 working days.
>
> I've got papers from FSF, signed it and sent it back. It was 6 working
> days ago. 5 days that you mention
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> It looks like 5 working days have passed since your email to FSF. If so,
> please follow up once and wait another 5 working days.
I've got papers from FSF, signed it and sent it back. It was 6 working
days ago. 5 days that you mention is for the first response from
Evgenii Klimov writes:
> PS: I didn't add TINYCHANGE since I have reached the contribution
> limit but FSF didn't respond yet.
It looks like 5 working days have passed since your email to FSF. If so,
please follow up once and wait another 5 working days.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org
Max Nikulin writes:
> On 11/07/2023 06:11, Evgenii Klimov wrote:
>> I added `org-summary-todo' example function, that are advertized in
>> `org-after-todo-statistics-hook', to my init file (with
>> lexical-binding: t) and got a compilation warning:
>>
>>Warning (bytecomp): Unused lexical
On 11/07/2023 06:11, Evgenii Klimov wrote:
I added `org-summary-todo' example function, that are advertized in
`org-after-todo-statistics-hook', to my init file (with
lexical-binding: t) and got a compilation warning:
Warning (bytecomp): Unused lexical variable `org-log-states'
May it be a
:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] org.el: Remove undefined dynamic variable `org-log-states'
from example
* lisp/org.el (org-after-todo-statistics-hook): Remove undefined
dynamic variable `org-log-states' from docstring example.
* doc/org-manual.org (Breaking Down Tasks into Subtasks): The same
th
