Sébastien Miquel writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> Thanks for the clarification! Now, your patch makes much more sense. Can
>> you update the commit message explaining the above shortly and linking
>> to this thread?
>
> See attached.
Thanks!
Applied onto main via 9fb9a2bdf with amendments to
2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien=20Miquel?=
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:04:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] org.el (org-format-latex-header): put DEFAULT-PACKAGES before
PACKAGES
* lisp/org.el (org-format-latex-header): put DEFAULT-PACKAGES before
PACKAGES, as per org-latex-packages-alist&#
Sébastien Miquel writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> We actually have 2 options here:
>> 1. Change the docstring
>> 2. Change the template
>>
>> Can moving [PACKAGES] up break the existing configs? It might.
>> I am inclined to change the docstring instead.
>
> Thanks for having a look at this.
>
Hi,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
We actually have 2 options here:
1. Change the docstring
2. Change the template
Can moving [PACKAGES] up break the existing configs? It might.
I am inclined to change the docstring instead.
Thanks for having a look at this.
It makes more sense for a package in PACK
Sébastien Miquel writes:
> The attached patch puts DEFAULT-PACKAGES before PACKAGES in
> org-format-latex-header, as per org-latex-packages-alist's and
> org-latex-classes' documentations.
> ...
> -\[PACKAGES]
> \[DEFAULT-PACKAGES]
> +\[PACKAGES]
Thanks!
We actually have 2 options here:
1. C
F-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien=20Miquel?=
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:04:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] org.el (org-format-latex-header): put DEFAULT-PACKAGES before
PACKAGES
* lisp/org.el (org-format-latex-header): put DEFAULT-PACKAGES before
PACKAGES, as per org-latex-packages-alist's documentation.
---
lisp/o
