"Christopher M. Miles" writes:
>> Then, for backward compatibility, we may treat any non-nil, non-list
>> (like '(4), '(16), '(64)), non-number (like 1, 11) value as
>> INCLUDE-LINKED. This way, the existing calls like
>> (org-toggle-inline-images t) will not be broken.
> ...
> I prefer this comp
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> "Christopher M. Miles" writes:
>
>>> I think that instead of changing the existing function, we can convert
>>> your patch into a new function `org-toggle-inline-images-command' that
>>> will be free to alter the argument order. We can then re-bind that
>>> function in
