Ihor Radchenko writes:
> I will be happy to merge a proper patch upon addressing possible
> pitfalls. I do not feel strongly about my variant vs. yours.
Max, do you have any update here? If not, I will merge my variant as it
should not break anything.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode
Max Nikulin writes:
>> The new version of the patch allows all but first function return nil.
>> See the attached.
>>
>> Let me know if there are any other objections.
>
> Ihor, sorry that I left your earlier questions with no response. I hope,
> the attached diff may illustrate my ideas
On 02/10/2022 16:14, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Ihor Radchenko writes:
Max Nikulin writes:
The new version of the patch allows all but first function return nil.
See the attached.
Let me know if there are any other objections.
Ihor, sorry that I left your earlier questions with no response. I
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Max Nikulin writes:
>
>>> I do not think that it is a good idea. We currently promise to use the
>>> first function in the list to generate the IDs. Other functions are
>>> mostly a fallback to catch the existing attach dirs created in the past
>>> using different ID
