Re: [POLL] ob-R, ob-julia: Should we force-disable ess-ask-for-ess-directory? (was: [BUG] Relative filenames for graphics output in ob-R.el [9.8-pre (release_9.7.4-80-g7fa169)])

Rudolf Adamkovič writes: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >> I'd like to hear from ob-R/ob-julia users whether the current behavior >> is something they rely on. If not, I'd prefer to follow the conventions >> we introduce in the manual and suppress the ESS's directory prompt. > > +1 from me; I have

Re: [POLL] ob-R, ob-julia: Should we force-disable ess-ask-for-ess-directory? (was: [BUG] Relative filenames for graphics output in ob-R.el [9.8-pre (release_9.7.4-80-g7fa169)])

Ihor Radchenko writes: > I'd like to hear from ob-R/ob-julia users whether the current behavior > is something they rely on. If not, I'd prefer to follow the conventions > we introduce in the manual and suppress the ESS's directory prompt. +1 from me; I have always found that ESS prompt

[POLL] ob-R, ob-julia: Should we force-disable ess-ask-for-ess-directory? (was: [BUG] Relative filenames for graphics output in ob-R.el [9.8-pre (release_9.7.4-80-g7fa169)])

[ Adding Org mailing list back to CC to keep the conversation public ] Sam Crawford writes: >> May you please create a reproducer? > > Sure: evaluating the following code cell > > #+begin_src R :session R :async yes :results file graphics :file test.png > plot(iris$Sepal.Length,