> I understand the problem, but the solution should not be: "let's pretend
> export does not exist".
>From my perspective any org object that is not in a section that
allows org objects could in principle be parsed as such, but it would
not be in the core of the grammar, and it also would have to
Hello,
John Kitchin writes:
> Not all org files are destined for export. I slightly feel users should be
> allowed to put citations in places where it might not make sense in export,
> and that they are responsible for knowing what they are doing.
>
> I am sympathetic to the reality that the
I'm not going to defend what Nicolas characterized as a "terrible
idea,", but to explain a bit ...
The idea was motivated by wanting to access org-cite activate and
follow functionality from the property drawer; NOT export (which as
Nicolas says, would cause problems).
The current
Not all org files are destined for export. I slightly feel users should be
allowed to put citations in places where it might not make sense in export,
and that they are responsible for knowing what they are doing.
I am sympathetic to the reality that the second half of that statement is a
big
> That would be a terrible idea. Exporters are not required to handle all
> data contained in properties drawers, so this may introduce errors,
> e.g., when trying to number citations.
I agree completely. You can't export something that has no anchor in
text that would be rendered. Maybe I
Hello,
Tom Gillespie writes:
> I could certainly imagine using it, and I don't see any issue with
> doing it from the point of view of the grammar.
That would be a terrible idea. Exporters are not required to handle all
data contained in properties drawers, so this may introduce errors,
Hi Bruce,
I could certainly imagine using it, and I don't see any issue with
doing it from the point of view of the grammar. Footnotes can appear
in a property drawer without issue, though obviously they don't
export. One question though since I may have missed this in the other
threads is
Just bumping this.
Another question about where to allow cite elements.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 4:18 PM Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>
> So this is a tentative request/question; I'm not really sure the best
> approach here.
>
> This is based on discussion with one of the org-roam-bibtex developers
>
So this is a tentative request/question; I'm not really sure the best
approach here.
This is based on discussion with one of the org-roam-bibtex developers
about what the proper way to indicate an org-roam note is a
bibliographic note; e.g. a note about a bibliographic source.
Traditionally in
